From: Wolfram Sang <w.sang@pengutronix.de>
To: Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de>
Cc: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>, Vitaly Bordug <vbordug@ru.mvista.com>,
devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers, char: add U-Boot bootcount driver
Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2011 12:47:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111204114741.GA5788@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1322991921-21096-1-git-send-email-hs@denx.de>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2308 bytes --]
On Sun, Dec 04, 2011 at 10:45:21AM +0100, Heiko Schocher wrote:
> This driver implements the Linux kernel half of the boot count feature -
> the boot counter can only be reset after it is clear that the
> application has been started and is running correctly, which usually
> can only be determined by the application code itself. Thus the reset
> of the boot counter must be done by application code, which thus needs
> an appropriate driver.
An appropriate mechanism, not necessarily a driver, see below.
> Required feature by the Carrier Grade Linux Requirements Definition;
> see for example document "Carrier Grade Linux Requirements Definition
> Overview V3.0" at
>
> http://www.linuxfoundation.org/collaborate/workgroups/cgl/requirements#SMM.6.0_Boot_Cycle_Detection
>
> Description: OSDL CGL specifies that carrier grade Linux
> shall provide support for detecting a repeating reboot cycle
> due to recurring failures. This detection should happen in
> user space before system services are started.
So, technically, a flag would be enough, not necessarily a counter? Although a
counter probably has more advantages...
> This driver provides read/write access to the U-Boot bootcounter
> through PROC FS and/or sysFS file.
Why ProcFS? Why ProcFS and/or SysFS? Which has priority? Why not /dev?
> The bootcountregister gets configured via DTS.
> for example on the enbw_cmc board:
>
> bootcount@0x23060 {
> compatible = "uboot,bootcount";
No. I assume you are not the vendor of what is at 0x23060, the actual device.
Only the device must be encoded in the compatible-entry which then implies the
bootcount functionality. Also, keep in mind that your solution should be
generic for bootloaders.
> reg = <0x23060 0x20>;
I assume that non-volatile memory would qualify as a boot-counter, so those
could be tied to I2C busses etc? reg would not fit then.
I do wonder if it makes more sense to add such functionality to the
watchdog-core to save the additional device (CCed). Needs a second thought,
though...
Regards,
Wolfram
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-04 11:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-12-04 9:45 [PATCH] drivers, char: add U-Boot bootcount driver Heiko Schocher
2011-12-04 10:34 ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2011-12-04 11:47 ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
2011-12-04 16:34 ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-12-05 7:43 ` Thierry Reding
2011-12-05 14:39 ` Heiko Schocher
2011-12-06 21:50 ` Wolfram Sang
2011-12-06 21:56 ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-12-06 22:06 ` Wolfram Sang
2011-12-06 23:22 ` Rob Herring
2012-01-30 12:35 ` Heiko Schocher
2011-12-04 16:42 ` Paul Bolle
2011-12-04 23:30 ` Ryan Mallon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111204114741.GA5788@pengutronix.de \
--to=w.sang@pengutronix.de \
--cc=devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=hs@denx.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vbordug@ru.mvista.com \
--cc=wd@denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).