From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
Federica Teodori <federica.teodori@googlemail.com>,
Lucian Adrian Grijincu <lucian.grijincu@gmail.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>,
Dan Rosenberg <drosenberg@vsecurity.com>,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2012.1] fs: symlink restrictions on sticky directories
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2012 11:05:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120106100520.GA7962@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120106015808.1655d1c9.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
* Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> Maybe true for a general purpose computer, but someone who is
> making a single-purpose device such as a digital TV or a wifi
> router won't want it.
That's the case for 99% of the features and semantics we have:
by definition a single-purpose device uses only a small sub-set
of an infinite purpose OS, right?
Still we only modularize semantics out if they easily fit into
some existing plug-in/module concept, if the feature is arguably
oddball that a sizable portion of people want to disable, or if
it makes notable sense for size reasons. To me it looked
distinctly silly to complicate things for such a small piece of
code.
I doubt Kees would mind modularizing it, but it would be nice to
get VFS maintainer feedback in the:
{ 'you are crazy, over my dead body' ... 'cool, merge it' }
continuous spectrum of possible answers.
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-06 10:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-04 20:18 [PATCH v2012.1] fs: symlink restrictions on sticky directories Kees Cook
2012-01-05 9:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-01-05 19:36 ` Kees Cook
2012-01-06 7:36 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-01-06 9:21 ` Andrew Morton
2012-01-06 9:43 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-01-06 9:58 ` Andrew Morton
2012-01-06 10:05 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2012-01-06 10:33 ` Andrew Morton
2012-01-06 11:16 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-01-06 18:34 ` Kees Cook
2012-01-06 18:44 ` Kees Cook
2012-01-05 14:30 ` Nick Bowler
2012-01-05 19:34 ` Kees Cook
2012-01-05 20:08 ` Nick Bowler
2012-01-05 20:55 ` Kees Cook
2012-01-05 22:18 ` Nick Bowler
2012-01-06 0:08 ` Kees Cook
2012-01-06 2:05 ` Rik van Riel
2012-01-06 7:34 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-01-06 7:10 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120106100520.GA7962@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=drosenberg@vsecurity.com \
--cc=eparis@redhat.com \
--cc=federica.teodori@googlemail.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lucian.grijincu@gmail.com \
--cc=rdunlap@xenotime.net \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).