From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752580Ab2AHArN (ORCPT ); Sat, 7 Jan 2012 19:47:13 -0500 Received: from imr4.ericy.com ([198.24.6.9]:43904 "EHLO imr4.ericy.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752242Ab2AHArM (ORCPT ); Sat, 7 Jan 2012 19:47:12 -0500 Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2012 16:45:02 -0800 From: Guenter Roeck To: Jonathan Nieder CC: Arnaud Patard , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Roman Mamedov , Manuel Roeder , Michael Ott , Rodolfo Giometti , Mauro Barella Subject: Re: [2.6.37 -> 2.6.38 regression] "mv64xxx: I2C bus locked, block: 1, time_left: 0" every few seconds Message-ID: <20120108004502.GA20549@ericsson.com> References: <20120101042401.4bef017e@natsu> <20120101073255.GA2402@elie.hsd1.il.comcast.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120101073255.GA2402@elie.hsd1.il.comcast.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Jan 01, 2012 at 01:32:55AM -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > Hi, > > Roman Mamedov wrote[1]: > > > This bug is still present for me in the latest kernel version in > > Debian testing (3.1.6). > > > > The last properly working kernel version seems to be: > [...] > > And the problem occurs since: > [...] > > Thanks. Arnaud, any hints? To summarize: > > - Michael Ott reported with Debian kernel 2.6.38-3 (which is closely > based on stable v2.6.38.2): > > syslog tell me every few seconds: > i2c i2c-0: mv64xxx: I2C bus locked, block: 1, time_left: 0 > > - Manuel Roeder reported the same and found that upstream v2.6.38 > triggers the problem and v2.6.37.6 does not. > > - Roman Mamedov finds the bug present in Debian 3.1.6-1 (which > is closely based on stable v3.1.6) and Debian 2.6.37-2 (based on > stable v2.6.37.2) but not Debian 2.6.37-1 (based on mainline > v2.6.37). > > The regression range described above seems a little inconsistent to > me, so maybe there's something more going on. > Points to commit eda6bee6c7e67b5bd17bdbced0926f5687f686d5 (i2c-mv64xxx: send repeated START between messages in xfer). Maybe you can back it out and see if it makes a difference. Guenter