From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755340Ab2APPwg (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Jan 2012 10:52:36 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:57697 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755293Ab2APPwU (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Jan 2012 10:52:20 -0500 Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 16:50:17 +0100 From: Andrew Jones To: Jerome Marchand Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rientjes@google.com, mingo@elte.hu, david.woodhouse@intel.com, gregkh@suse.de, davem@davemloft.net, axboe@kernel.dk, arnd@arndb.de, holt@sgi.com, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux@arm.linux.org.uk, hskinnemoen@gmail.com, egtvedt@samfundet.no, msalter@redhat.com, a-jacquiot@ti.com, starvik@axis.com, jesper.nilsson@axis.com, dhowells@redhat.com, takata@linux-m32r.org, geert@linux-m68k.org, yasutake.koichi@jp.panasonic.com, jonas@southpole.se, kyle@mcmartin.ca, deller@gmx.de, jejb@parisc-linux.org, chris@zankel.net, greg@kroah.com, davej@redhat.com, airlied@linux.ie, jkosina@suse.cz, mchehab@infradead.org, johannes@sipsolutions.net, linville@tuxdriver.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] kconfig: untangle EXPERT and EMBEDDED Message-ID: <20120116155004.GA6999@turtle.usersys.redhat.com> References: <1326295008-29795-1-git-send-email-drjones@redhat.com> <4F1444FF.60205@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4F1444FF.60205@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 04:40:47PM +0100, Jerome Marchand wrote: > > @@ -1259,8 +1259,7 @@ config SLUB > > a slab allocator. > > > > config SLOB > > - depends on EXPERT > > - bool "SLOB (Simple Allocator)" > > + bool "SLOB (Simple Allocator)" if EXPERT > > help > > SLOB replaces the stock allocator with a drastically simpler > > allocator. SLOB is generally more space efficient but > > Am I missing something or this particular chunk does not actually change > anything? > No, you're correct. There's no actual change, so the hunk could be dubbed as an unnecessary cleanup. I made the change in order to give it the same general format as the rest of the expert options in that file. Drew