From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1753886Ab2AQMYj (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Tue, 17 Jan 2012 07:24:39 -0500
Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:43521 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1753809Ab2AQMYg (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 17 Jan 2012 07:24:36 -0500
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 13:23:50 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@us.ibm.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
        Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
        Roland McGrath <roland@hack.frob.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@infradead.org>,
        Anton Arapov <anton@redhat.com>,
        Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>,
        Jim Keniston <jkenisto@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 3.2 7/9] tracing: uprobes trace_event interface
Message-ID: <20120117122350.GD4959@elte.hu>
References: <20120110114821.17610.9188.sendpatchset@srdronam.in.ibm.com>
 <20120110114943.17610.28293.sendpatchset@srdronam.in.ibm.com>
 <20120116131137.GB5265@m.brq.redhat.com>
 <20120117092838.GB10397@elte.hu>
 <20120117102231.GB15447@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
 <20120117112239.GA23859@elte.hu>
 <20120117115705.GD15447@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20120117115705.GD15447@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-ELTE-SpamScore: -2.0
X-ELTE-SpamLevel: 
X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no
X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 
X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-2.0 required=5.9 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.3.1
	-2.0 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.0 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org


* Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:

> > Srikar, rebased commits like this one:
> > 
> >   c5af743: rcu: Introduce raw SRCU read-side primitives
> > 
> > are absolutely inacceptable:
> > 
> 
> Okay, I wasnt sure whats the best way for me to expose a tree 
> such that people who just use my tree to try (without basing 
> on any other trees except Linus) can build and use uprobes but 
> people who already have this commit arent affected by me 
> having this commit.
> 
> So couple of people did tell me that git was intelligent enuf 
> that if the commit was already in, it would create a empty 
> commit.
> 
> do you have suggestions on how to work around such situations 
> in future?

You can just apply it out of email, as a regular commit.

Thanks,

	Ingo