From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753479Ab2ARWG0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Jan 2012 17:06:26 -0500 Received: from mail-bk0-f46.google.com ([209.85.214.46]:37649 "EHLO mail-bk0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753274Ab2ARWGZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Jan 2012 17:06:25 -0500 Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 01:06:16 +0300 From: Alexey Dobriyan To: Paul Bolle Cc: Andrew Morton , Andrew Jones , rientjes@google.com, mingo@elte.hu, david.woodhouse@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, gregkh@suse.de, davem@davemloft.net, axboe@kernel.dk, arnd@arndb.de, holt@sgi.com, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux@arm.linux.org.uk, hskinnemoen@gmail.com, egtvedt@samfundet.no, msalter@redhat.com, a-jacquiot@ti.com, starvik@axis.com, jesper nilsson , dhowells@redhat.com, takata@linux-m32r.org, geert@linux-m68k.org, yasutake koichi , jonas@southpole.se, kyle@mcmartin.ca, deller@gmx.de, jejb@parisc-linux.org, chris@zankel.net, greg@kroah.com, davej@redhat.com, airlied@linux.ie, jkosina@suse.cz, mchehab@infradead.org, johannes@sipsolutions.net, linville@tuxdriver.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] kconfig: untangle EXPERT and EMBEDDED Message-ID: <20120118220616.GA5351@p183.telecom.by> References: <1326295008-29795-1-git-send-email-drjones@redhat.com> <20120118122830.037f1e29.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <1326923285.9412.21.camel@x61.thuisdomein> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1326923285.9412.21.camel@x61.thuisdomein> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 10:48:05PM +0100, Paul Bolle wrote: > Are there any mainstream distributions that do not enable EXPERIMENTAL? I don't think so. Regardless, CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL should be ignored when deciding whether to enable feature or not.