From: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@canonical.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: ecryptfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, john.johansen@canonical.com,
dustin.kirkland@gazzang.com, Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>,
Li Wang <liwang@nudt.edu.cn>
Subject: Re: eCryptfs: Truncate path improvements
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 10:57:15 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120123165714.GA20665@boyd> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFzpM-c9FWdC8+7sV0GOXqvFNvxPsrV42rvXJHXnKsDoZg@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 714 bytes --]
On 2012-01-23 08:49:40, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 2:35 PM, Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@canonical.com> wrote:
> > As Linus pointed out[1], eCryptfs needs more checks around its truncate path.
> > The first patch in this series makes it possible for an eCryptfs truncate
> > operation to be gracefully interrupted by a fatal signal. The second adds
> > checks for eCryptfs inode changes in setattr. The third is simply removal of
> > an old, unused function.
>
> Tyler, should I take these patches directly? Or are these just for
> review and I should wait for a pull request?
Just for review, as I'll send a pull request.
I'll try to be more clear about that in the future.
Tyler
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-23 16:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-20 22:35 eCryptfs: Truncate path improvements Tyler Hicks
2012-01-20 22:35 ` [PATCH 1/3] eCryptfs: Make truncate path killable Tyler Hicks
2012-01-20 22:35 ` [PATCH 2/3] eCryptfs: Check inode changes in setattr Tyler Hicks
2012-01-20 22:35 ` [PATCH 3/3] eCryptfs: Remove unused ecryptfs_read() Tyler Hicks
[not found] ` <527098189.19032@eyou.net>
2012-01-21 7:57 ` Re:[PATCH 2/3] eCryptfs: Check inode changes in setattr Li Wang
2012-01-24 6:32 ` [PATCH " Tyler Hicks
2012-01-24 7:37 ` [PATCH 2/3 v2] " Tyler Hicks
[not found] ` <527389872.29922@eyou.net>
2012-01-24 14:14 ` Li Wang
2012-01-25 7:40 ` [PATCH] eCryptfs: move misleading function comments Li Wang
2012-01-23 16:49 ` eCryptfs: Truncate path improvements Linus Torvalds
2012-01-23 16:57 ` Tyler Hicks [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120123165714.GA20665@boyd \
--to=tyhicks@canonical.com \
--cc=dustin.kirkland@gazzang.com \
--cc=ecryptfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=john.johansen@canonical.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liwang@nudt.edu.cn \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).