From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757198Ab2AXRna (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Jan 2012 12:43:30 -0500 Received: from relay1.sgi.com ([192.48.179.29]:37889 "EHLO relay.sgi.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757167Ab2AXRn3 (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Jan 2012 12:43:29 -0500 Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 11:43:30 -0600 From: Ben Myers To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Greg KH , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk Subject: Re: [41/42] xfs: validate acl count Message-ID: <20120124174330.GQ8262@sgi.com> References: <20120110215031.GA19398@kroah.com> <20120110215024.482323323@clark.kroah.org> <20120111074135.GA30829@lst.de> <20120111150021.GB23608@suse.de> <20120111150532.GL20739@sgi.com> <20120113161727.GB6519@sgi.com> <20120113181952.GA30393@suse.de> <20120113194218.GB14857@sgi.com> <20120113195206.GA16462@suse.de> <20120124163301.GA6077@lst.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120124163301.GA6077@lst.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Christoph, On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 05:33:01PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 11:52:06AM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > > > > > I ran xfstests with 'xfs: validate acl count' and 'xfs: fix acl count > > > > > validation in xfs_acl_from_disk()' applied to 3.1-stable. It came out > > > > > ok. I'll get started on 2.6.32. > > > > > > > > Thanks, how about the 3.0 release? > > > > > > HCH would have given them a spin before he sent them to stable@. > > > > You are right, sorry, for some reason I thought that was for 3.1, too > > many different kernel trees at the moment :( > > This should go into 3.0 and 3.1 stable, too. This made 3.0, but unfortunately not 3.1, which is end-of-life. -Ben > And I think this one actually is simple enough that I don't need a QA > run, so if you can just add it, please do. >