From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>, Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 -mm 1/3] mm: reclaim at order 0 when compaction is enabled
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 15:31:27 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120127153127.f1fa82c3.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120126145914.58619765@cuia.bos.redhat.com>
On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 14:59:14 -0500
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> wrote:
> When built with CONFIG_COMPACTION, kswapd should not try to free
> contiguous pages, because it is not trying hard enough to have
> a real chance at being successful, but still disrupts the LRU
> enough to break other things.
>
> Do not do higher order page isolation unless we really are in
> lumpy reclaim mode.
>
> Stop reclaiming pages once we have enough free pages that
> compaction can deal with things, and we hit the normal order 0
> watermarks used by kswapd.
>
> Also remove a line of code that increments balanced right before
> exiting the function.
>
> ...
>
> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -1139,7 +1139,7 @@ int __isolate_lru_page(struct page *page, isolate_mode_t mode, int file)
> * @mz: The mem_cgroup_zone to pull pages from.
> * @dst: The temp list to put pages on to.
> * @nr_scanned: The number of pages that were scanned.
> - * @order: The caller's attempted allocation order
> + * @sc: The scan_control struct for this reclaim session
> * @mode: One of the LRU isolation modes
> * @active: True [1] if isolating active pages
> * @file: True [1] if isolating file [!anon] pages
> @@ -1148,8 +1148,8 @@ int __isolate_lru_page(struct page *page, isolate_mode_t mode, int file)
> */
> static unsigned long isolate_lru_pages(unsigned long nr_to_scan,
> struct mem_cgroup_zone *mz, struct list_head *dst,
> - unsigned long *nr_scanned, int order, isolate_mode_t mode,
> - int active, int file)
> + unsigned long *nr_scanned, struct scan_control *sc,
> + isolate_mode_t mode, int active, int file)
> {
> struct lruvec *lruvec;
> struct list_head *src;
> @@ -1195,7 +1195,7 @@ static unsigned long isolate_lru_pages(unsigned long nr_to_scan,
> BUG();
> }
>
> - if (!order)
> + if (!sc->order || !(sc->reclaim_mode & RECLAIM_MODE_LUMPYRECLAIM))
We should have a comment here explaining the reason for the code.
And the immediately following comment isn't very good: "Only take those
pages of the same active state as that tag page". As is common with
poor comments, it tells us "what", but not "why". Reclaiming inactive
_and_ inactive pages would make larger-page freeing more successful and
might be a good thing! Apparently someone felt otherwise, but the
reader is kept in the dark...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-27 23:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-26 19:54 [PATCH v3 -mm 0/3] kswapd vs compaction improvements Rik van Riel
2012-01-26 19:59 ` [PATCH v3 -mm 1/3] mm: reclaim at order 0 when compaction is enabled Rik van Riel
2012-01-27 9:13 ` Hillf Danton
2012-01-27 16:35 ` Rik van Riel
2012-01-30 10:26 ` Mel Gorman
2012-01-27 23:31 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2012-01-29 13:25 ` Hillf Danton
2012-01-30 10:36 ` Mel Gorman
2012-01-26 19:59 ` [PATCH v3 -mm 2/3] mm: kswapd carefully call compaction Rik van Riel
2012-01-27 23:36 ` Andrew Morton
2012-01-26 20:01 ` [PATCH v3 -mm 3/3] mm: only defer compaction for failed order and higher Rik van Riel
2012-01-30 10:47 ` Mel Gorman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120127153127.f1fa82c3.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
--cc=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).