From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: rjw@sisk.pl, pavel@ucw.cz, len.brown@intel.com,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] PM/Freezer: Make thaw_processes() thaw only userspace tasks
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 14:27:08 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120130222708.GD27616@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F271849.302@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 03:53:05AM +0530, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
> Yes, I was aware that it introduces such a window. But I ignored it in the
> interest of making the patch series sensible (as in, for example, patch
> 2/4 wouldn't make much sense without patch 1/4).
> Maybe I will interchange patch 1 and patch 2 and just reword the patch
> descriptions suitably so that they still make sense..
Yeah, I think saying sth like "Make extra calls to thaw_kthread in
preparation for blah blah.." should do.
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-30 22:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-30 22:04 [PATCH 0/4] PM / Freezer: Fix the semantics of thaw_processes() and thaw_kernel_threads() Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-01-30 22:04 ` [PATCH 1/4] PM/Freezer: Make thaw_processes() thaw only userspace tasks Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-01-30 22:09 ` Tejun Heo
2012-01-30 22:23 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-01-30 22:27 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2012-01-30 22:05 ` [PATCH 2/4] PM/Freezer: Use thaw_processes() and thaw_kernel_threads() correctly Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-01-30 22:05 ` [PATCH 3/4] PM/Hibernate: Thaw kernel threads in hibernation_snapshot() in error/test path Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-01-30 22:05 ` [PATCH 4/4] PM/Hibernate: Refactor and simplify freezer_test_done Srivatsa S. Bhat
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120130222708.GD27616@google.com \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).