From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753364Ab2AaLxZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Jan 2012 06:53:25 -0500 Received: from mga14.intel.com ([143.182.124.37]:37814 "EHLO mga14.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752742Ab2AaLxZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Jan 2012 06:53:25 -0500 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.71,315,1320652800"; d="scan'208";a="101491980" Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 19:42:56 +0800 From: Wu Fengguang To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Shaohua Li , lkml , linux-mm , Andrew Morton , Jens Axboe , Herbert Poetzl , Eric Dumazet , Vivek Goyal Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix readahead pipeline break caused by block plug Message-ID: <20120131114256.GA8796@localhost> References: <1327996780.21268.42.camel@sli10-conroe> <20120131103416.GA1661@localhost> <20120131104621.GA27003@infradead.org> <20120131105754.GA3867@localhost> <20120131113452.GA3235@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120131113452.GA3235@infradead.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 06:34:52AM -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 06:57:54PM +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote: > > The problem is, there are a dozen of ->direct_IO callback functions. > > While there are only two ->direct_IO() callers, one for READ and > > another for WRITE, which are much easier to deal with. > > So what? Better do a bit more work now and keep the damn thing > maintainable. What if we add a wrapper function for doing blk_start_plug(&plug); ->direct_IO() blk_finish_plug(&plug); Thanks, Fengguang