linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	vgoyal@redhat.com, kexec-list <kexec@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, kdump, ioapic: Fix kdump race with migrating irq
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 17:27:51 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120131222751.GE5650@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m1ipjr4jaa.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org>

On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 02:08:29PM -0800, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> > The problem is that although kdump tries to shutdown minimal hardware,
> > it still needs to disable the IO APIC.  This requires spinlocks which
> > may be held by another cpu.  This other cpu is being held infinitely in
> > an NMI context by kdump in order to serialize the crashing path.  Instant
> > deadlock.
> 
> Can you test to see if kexec on panic still needs to disable the IO
> APIC.  Last I looked we were close if not all of the way there to not
> needing to boot the kernel in pic mode?

Ok, so you just blindly remove disable_IO_APIC from
native_machine_crash_shutdown and re-run some panic tests on various
machines?  What about the disable_IO_APIC path in native_machine_shutdown?

Also, where could I look to see if that work was done?  Is that in the
ioapic setup code?

> 
> If we can skip the ioapic disable entirely we should be much more
> robust.

Agreed.

Cheers,
Don

  reply	other threads:[~2012-01-31 22:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-01-31 21:25 [PATCH] x86, kdump, ioapic: Fix kdump race with migrating irq Don Zickus
2012-01-31 21:37 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-01-31 22:08 ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-01-31 22:27   ` Don Zickus [this message]
2012-01-31 22:38     ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-02-01 23:04       ` Don Zickus
2012-02-02  1:34         ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-02-02 15:33           ` Don Zickus
2012-02-02 17:45           ` Don Zickus
2012-02-20 15:20 ` Seiji Aguchi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120131222751.GE5650@redhat.com \
    --to=dzickus@redhat.com \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).