[78/89] rds: Make rds_sock_lock BH rather than IRQ safe.

From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, Kumar Sanghvi <kumaras@chelsio.com>,
	Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: [78/89] rds: Make rds_sock_lock BH rather than IRQ safe.
Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2012 13:00:42 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120201210050.722676273@clark.kroah.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120201210505.GA26028@kroah.com>

3.2-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------


From: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>

[ Upstream commit efc3dbc37412c027e363736b4f4c74ee5e8ecffc ]

rds_sock_info() triggers locking warnings because we try to perform a
local_bh_enable() (via sock_i_ino()) while hardware interrupts are
disabled (via taking rds_sock_lock).

There is no reason for rds_sock_lock to be a hardware IRQ disabling
lock, none of these access paths run in hardware interrupt context.

Therefore making it a BH disabling lock is safe and sufficient to
fix this bug.

Reported-by: Kumar Sanghvi <kumaras@chelsio.com>
Reported-by: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 net/rds/af_rds.c |   20 ++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

--- a/net/rds/af_rds.c
+++ b/net/rds/af_rds.c
@@ -68,7 +68,6 @@ static int rds_release(struct socket *so
 {
 	struct sock *sk = sock->sk;
 	struct rds_sock *rs;
-	unsigned long flags;
 
 	if (!sk)
 		goto out;
@@ -94,10 +93,10 @@ static int rds_release(struct socket *so
 	rds_rdma_drop_keys(rs);
 	rds_notify_queue_get(rs, NULL);
 
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&rds_sock_lock, flags);
+	spin_lock_bh(&rds_sock_lock);
 	list_del_init(&rs->rs_item);
 	rds_sock_count--;
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rds_sock_lock, flags);
+	spin_unlock_bh(&rds_sock_lock);
 
 	rds_trans_put(rs->rs_transport);
 
@@ -409,7 +408,6 @@ static const struct proto_ops rds_proto_
 
 static int __rds_create(struct socket *sock, struct sock *sk, int protocol)
 {
-	unsigned long flags;
 	struct rds_sock *rs;
 
 	sock_init_data(sock, sk);
@@ -426,10 +424,10 @@ static int __rds_create(struct socket *s
 	spin_lock_init(&rs->rs_rdma_lock);
 	rs->rs_rdma_keys = RB_ROOT;
 
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&rds_sock_lock, flags);
+	spin_lock_bh(&rds_sock_lock);
 	list_add_tail(&rs->rs_item, &rds_sock_list);
 	rds_sock_count++;
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rds_sock_lock, flags);
+	spin_unlock_bh(&rds_sock_lock);
 
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -471,12 +469,11 @@ static void rds_sock_inc_info(struct soc
 {
 	struct rds_sock *rs;
 	struct rds_incoming *inc;
-	unsigned long flags;
 	unsigned int total = 0;
 
 	len /= sizeof(struct rds_info_message);
 
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&rds_sock_lock, flags);
+	spin_lock_bh(&rds_sock_lock);
 
 	list_for_each_entry(rs, &rds_sock_list, rs_item) {
 		read_lock(&rs->rs_recv_lock);
@@ -492,7 +489,7 @@ static void rds_sock_inc_info(struct soc
 		read_unlock(&rs->rs_recv_lock);
 	}
 
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rds_sock_lock, flags);
+	spin_unlock_bh(&rds_sock_lock);
 
 	lens->nr = total;
 	lens->each = sizeof(struct rds_info_message);
@@ -504,11 +501,10 @@ static void rds_sock_info(struct socket
 {
 	struct rds_info_socket sinfo;
 	struct rds_sock *rs;
-	unsigned long flags;
 
 	len /= sizeof(struct rds_info_socket);
 
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&rds_sock_lock, flags);
+	spin_lock_bh(&rds_sock_lock);
 
 	if (len < rds_sock_count)
 		goto out;
@@ -529,7 +525,7 @@ out:
 	lens->nr = rds_sock_count;
 	lens->each = sizeof(struct rds_info_socket);
 
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rds_sock_lock, flags);
+	spin_unlock_bh(&rds_sock_lock);
 }
 
 static void rds_exit(void)


