From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933607Ab2BBX05 (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Feb 2012 18:26:57 -0500 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:38378 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932145Ab2BBX0u (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Feb 2012 18:26:50 -0500 Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2012 15:26:48 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Cyrill Gorcunov Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Pavel Emelyanov , Serge Hallyn , KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki , Kees Cook , Tejun Heo , Andrew Vagin , "Eric W. Biederman" , Alexey Dobriyan , Andi Kleen , Vasiliy Kulikov Subject: Re: [patch cr 3/4] c/r: procfs: add arg_start/end, env_start/end and exit_code members to /proc/$pid/stat Message-Id: <20120202152648.bff836b4.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20120130141852.377457689@openvz.org> References: <20120130140905.441199885@openvz.org> <20120130141852.377457689@openvz.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.0.2 (GTK+ 2.20.1; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 18:09:08 +0400 Cyrill Gorcunov wrote: > We would like to have an ability to restore command line > arguments and envirion pointers so the task being restored > would print appropriate values in /proc/pid/cmdline and > /proc/pid/envirion. The exit_code is needed to restore > zombie tasks. > > ... > > --- linux-2.6.git.orig/fs/proc/array.c > +++ linux-2.6.git/fs/proc/array.c > @@ -464,7 +464,7 @@ static int do_task_stat(struct seq_file > > seq_printf(m, "%d (%s) %c %d %d %d %d %d %u %lu \ > %lu %lu %lu %lu %lu %ld %ld %ld %ld %d 0 %llu %lu %ld %lu %lu %lu %lu %lu \ > -%lu %lu %lu %lu %lu %lu %lu %lu %d %d %u %u %llu %lu %ld %lu %lu %lu\n", > +%lu %lu %lu %lu %lu %lu %lu %lu %d %d %u %u %llu %lu %ld ", > pid_nr_ns(pid, ns), > tcomm, > state, > @@ -511,10 +511,25 @@ static int do_task_stat(struct seq_file > task->policy, > (unsigned long long)delayacct_blkio_ticks(task), > cputime_to_clock_t(gtime), > - cputime_to_clock_t(cgtime), > - (mm && permitted) ? mm->start_data : 0, > - (mm && permitted) ? mm->end_data : 0, > - (mm && permitted) ? mm->start_brk : 0); > + cputime_to_clock_t(cgtime)); > + > + if (mm && permitted) { > + seq_printf(m, "%lu %lu %lu %lu %lu %lu %lu ", > + mm->start_data, > + mm->end_data, > + mm->start_brk, > + mm->arg_start, > + mm->arg_end, > + mm->env_start, > + mm->env_end); > + } else > + seq_printf(m, "0 0 0 0 0 0 0 "); heh. We have a whizzy new num_to_str() in -mm which can later be used to speed this up. This actually means that your patch will conflict horridly with procfs-add-num_to_str-to-speed-up-proc-stat.patch, because that patch redoes /proc/stat handling. I guess I can take care of that issue. > + > + if (permitted) > + seq_printf(m, "%d\n", task->exit_code); > + else > + seq_printf(m, "0\n"); > + > if (mm) > mmput(mm); > return 0;