From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
To: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>
Cc: Tarun Kanti DebBarma <tarun.kanti@ti.com>,
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, khilman@ti.com, tony@atomide.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Charulatha V <charu@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 01/25] gpio/omap: remove dependency on gpio_bank_count
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2012 12:16:30 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120202191630.GT15343@ponder.secretlab.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120202184106.GC29215@legolas.emea.dhcp.ti.com>
On Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 08:41:07PM +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 11:00:27PM +0530, Tarun Kanti DebBarma wrote:
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c
> > index 0b05629..6ea7390 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c
> > @@ -28,7 +28,10 @@
> > #include <asm/gpio.h>
> > #include <asm/mach/irq.h>
> >
> > +static LIST_HEAD(omap_gpio_list);
>
> I guess it's now too late because patch is acked and everything, but I
> think if you make the driver handle one bank alone and just instantiate
> it multiple times (omap_gpio.0, omap_gpio.1, omap_gpio.3, etc) driver
> would be faaaaaar simpler.
Is there any shared state between the banks? On my very cursory glance it
looked like banks still have some interaction between them. If not, then
yes I agree that multiple instances would be better.
g.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-02 19:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-02 17:30 [PATCH v9 00/25] gpio/omap: driver cleanup and fixes Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2012-02-02 17:30 ` [PATCH v9 01/25] gpio/omap: remove dependency on gpio_bank_count Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2012-02-02 18:41 ` Felipe Balbi
2012-02-02 19:16 ` Grant Likely [this message]
2012-02-02 19:45 ` Felipe Balbi
2012-02-02 20:48 ` Cousson, Benoit
2012-02-02 21:49 ` Felipe Balbi
2012-02-02 21:53 ` Felipe Balbi
2012-02-02 22:00 ` Cousson, Benoit
2012-02-02 22:07 ` Felipe Balbi
2012-02-03 17:50 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-02-04 16:08 ` Felipe Balbi
2012-02-05 7:07 ` Varadarajan, Charulatha
2012-02-05 9:08 ` Felipe Balbi
2012-02-05 9:16 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2012-02-05 11:35 ` Felipe Balbi
2012-02-05 12:35 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2012-02-06 6:40 ` Felipe Balbi
2012-02-06 5:18 ` Varadarajan, Charulatha
2012-02-02 17:30 ` [PATCH v9 02/25] gpio/omap: use flag to identify wakeup domain Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2012-02-02 17:30 ` [PATCH v9 03/25] gpio/omap: make gpio_context part of gpio_bank structure Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2012-02-02 17:30 ` [PATCH v9 04/25] gpio/omap: handle save/restore context in GPIO driver Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2012-02-02 17:30 ` [PATCH v9 05/25] gpio/omap: make non-wakeup GPIO part of pdata Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2012-02-02 17:30 ` [PATCH v9 06/25] gpio/omap: avoid cpu checks during module ena/disable Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2012-02-02 17:30 ` [PATCH v9 07/25] gpio/omap: further cleanup using wkup_en register Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2012-02-02 17:30 ` [PATCH v9 08/25] gpio/omap: use level/edge detect reg offsets Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2012-02-02 17:30 ` [PATCH v9 09/25] gpio/omap: remove hardcoded offsets in context save/restore Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2012-02-02 17:30 ` [PATCH v9 10/25] gpio/omap: cleanup set_gpio_triggering function Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2012-02-02 17:30 ` [PATCH v9 11/25] gpio/omap: cleanup omap_gpio_mod_init function Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2012-04-21 14:03 ` Janusz Krzysztofik
2012-04-23 18:54 ` DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
2012-04-24 15:36 ` DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
2012-04-24 16:04 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-04-25 4:34 ` DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
2012-04-25 6:39 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2012-04-25 12:54 ` DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
2012-04-25 13:45 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-04-26 5:13 ` DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
2012-04-27 21:31 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-04-24 22:37 ` Janusz Krzysztofik
2012-02-02 17:30 ` [PATCH v9 12/25] gpio/omap: use pinctrl offset instead of macro Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2012-02-02 17:30 ` [PATCH v9 13/25] gpio/omap: remove unnecessary bit-masking for read access Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2012-02-02 17:30 ` [PATCH v9 14/25] gpio/omap: remove bank->method & METHOD_* macros Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2012-02-02 17:30 ` [PATCH v9 15/25] gpio/omap: fix bankwidth for OMAP7xx MPUIO Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2012-02-02 17:30 ` [PATCH v9 16/25] gpio/omap: use pm-runtime framework Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2012-02-02 17:30 ` [PATCH v9 17/25] gpio/omap: optimize suspend and resume functions Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2012-02-02 17:30 ` [PATCH v9 18/25] gpio/omap: cleanup prepare_for_idle and resume_after_idle Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2012-02-02 17:30 ` [PATCH v9 19/25] gpio/omap: fix debounce clock handling Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2012-02-02 17:30 ` [PATCH v9 20/25] gpio/omap: fix incorrect access of debounce module Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2012-02-02 17:30 ` [PATCH v9 21/25] gpio/omap: remove omap_gpio_save_context overhead Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2012-02-02 17:30 ` [PATCH v9 22/25] gpio/omap: save and restore debounce registers Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2012-02-02 17:30 ` [PATCH v9 23/25] gpio/omap: enable irq at the end of all configuration in restore Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2012-02-02 17:30 ` [PATCH v9 24/25] gpio/omap: restore OE only after setting the output level Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2012-02-02 17:30 ` [PATCH v9 25/25] gpio/omap: handle set_dataout reg capable IP on restore Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2012-02-02 19:42 ` [PATCH v9 00/25] gpio/omap: driver cleanup and fixes Grant Likely
2012-02-03 17:51 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-02-03 21:16 ` Grant Likely
2012-02-03 9:21 ` Hebbar, Gururaja
[not found] ` <CAC83ZvLoYVofH9oKXw92i-=DbP2i3NfZjLGSJwk1j0JvXcFZVQ@mail.gmail.com>
2012-02-03 12:09 ` Hebbar, Gururaja
2012-02-03 21:01 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-02-06 11:53 ` DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
2012-02-10 19:24 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-02-10 19:55 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-02-13 5:33 ` DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120202191630.GT15343@ponder.secretlab.ca \
--to=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
--cc=balbi@ti.com \
--cc=charu@ti.com \
--cc=khilman@ti.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tarun.kanti@ti.com \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).