From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753909Ab2BFGMA (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Feb 2012 01:12:00 -0500 Received: from ipmail04.adl6.internode.on.net ([150.101.137.141]:64058 "EHLO ipmail04.adl6.internode.on.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752873Ab2BFGL7 (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Feb 2012 01:11:59 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ArMFAFxuL095LD+b/2dsb2JhbAA9BoULqG2BPoEGgXIBAQUjDwEjIxAIAw4KAgImAgIUJQMhEQKvNpEuE4EchzkDgnkBBQICHQQGAQsBCAUDAwkGBA8DAwGEHQEDAQQegiMzYwSVJ4kwiUAp Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2012 17:11:56 +1100 From: Dave Chinner To: Roland Eggner Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [kmemleak report 1/2] kernel 3.1.6, x86_64: mm, xfs ?, vfs ? Message-ID: <20120206061156.GA12836@dastard> References: <20120115222932.GA24330@mobil.systemanalysen.net> <20120115223701.GA3937@mobil.systemanalysen.net> <20120120000800.GA24762@mobil.systemanalysen.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20120120000800.GA24762@mobil.systemanalysen.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 01:08:00AM +0100, Roland Eggner wrote: > With kernel 3.1.6 + cherry-picked “kmemleak: Handle percpu memory allocation” as > suggested by Catalin Marinas, I get no significant changes to kmemleak reports, > and e.g. following /proc/meminfo snapshots. I wonder, is such a huge slab > memory normal? Is there anything else suspicious? Having 200k inodes in memory when you have 20+ filesystems is not unusual. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com