From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Nick Bowler <nbowler@elliptictech.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Kevin Winchester <kjwinchester@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: MCE, AMD: Hide smp-only code around CONFIG_SMP
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2012 09:06:48 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120209080648.GI18387@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120208101956.GA1772@x1.osrc.amd.com>
* Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> wrote:
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/smp.h
> @@ -33,8 +33,15 @@ static inline bool cpu_has_ht_siblings(void)
>
> DECLARE_PER_CPU(cpumask_var_t, cpu_sibling_map);
> DECLARE_PER_CPU(cpumask_var_t, cpu_core_map);
> -/* cpus sharing the last level cache: */
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> +/* CPUs sharing the last level cache: */
> DECLARE_PER_CPU(cpumask_var_t, cpu_llc_shared_map);
> +#else
> +static DECLARE_BITMAP(cpu_llc_shared_bits, NR_CPUS) __read_mostly = { [0] = 1UL };
> +static struct cpumask *const cpu_llc_shared_map = to_cpumask(cpu_llc_shared_bits);
> +#endif
Why not just expose it like on SMP?
We want to *reduce* the specialness of UP, not increase it - one
more word of .data and .text does not matter much - UP is
becoming more and more an oddball, rarely tested config. By the
time these changes hit any real boxes it will be even more
oddball.
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-09 8:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-02 19:10 [PATCH] MCE, AMD: Select SMP explicitly Borislav Petkov
2012-02-02 19:37 ` Nick Bowler
2012-02-02 20:24 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-02-03 19:18 ` MCE, AMD: Hide smp-only code around CONFIG_SMP Borislav Petkov
2012-02-03 22:05 ` Randy Dunlap
2012-02-07 9:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-02-08 0:41 ` Kevin Winchester
2012-02-08 10:19 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-02-08 12:22 ` Kevin Winchester
2012-02-08 13:05 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-02-09 8:06 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2012-02-10 0:00 ` Kevin Winchester
2012-02-11 14:07 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-02-12 0:24 ` [PATCH] x86: Move per cpu cpu_llc_shared_map to a field in struct cpuinfo_x86 Kevin Winchester
2012-02-12 2:18 ` Kevin Winchester
2012-02-12 11:19 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-02-14 0:12 ` [PATCH v2] " Kevin Winchester
2012-02-17 11:56 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-02-17 13:12 ` Kevin Winchester
2012-02-21 2:06 ` [PATCH 0/5] x86: Cleanup and simplify cpu-specific data Kevin Winchester
2012-02-21 2:06 ` [PATCH 1/5] x86: Move per cpu cpu_llc_shared_map to a field in struct cpuinfo_x86 Kevin Winchester
2012-02-21 15:42 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-02-21 2:06 ` [PATCH 2/5] x86: Move per cpu cpu_llc_id " Kevin Winchester
2012-02-21 10:37 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-02-21 10:40 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-02-21 2:06 ` [PATCH 3/5] x86: Move per cpu cpu_sibling_map " Kevin Winchester
2012-02-21 11:35 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-02-21 2:06 ` [PATCH 4/5] x86: Move per cpu cpu_core_map " Kevin Winchester
2012-02-21 14:21 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-02-21 2:06 ` [PATCH 5/5] x86: Remove #ifdef CONFIG_SMP sections by moving smp_num_siblings into common.c Kevin Winchester
2012-02-21 15:39 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-02-22 1:44 ` Kevin Winchester
2012-02-22 1:45 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] x86: Cleanup and simplify cpu-specific data Kevin Winchester
2012-02-22 1:45 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] x86: Move per cpu cpu_llc_shared_map to a field in struct cpuinfo_x86 Kevin Winchester
2012-02-22 6:39 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-02-22 9:27 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-02-22 12:24 ` Kevin Winchester
2012-02-22 23:32 ` [PATCH v3 0/5] x86: Cleanup and simplify cpu-specific data Kevin Winchester
2012-02-22 23:32 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] x86: Move per cpu cpu_llc_shared_map to a field in struct cpuinfo_x86 Kevin Winchester
2012-02-22 23:32 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] x86: Move per cpu cpu_llc_id " Kevin Winchester
2012-02-22 23:32 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] x86: Move per cpu cpu_sibling_map " Kevin Winchester
2012-02-22 23:32 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] x86: Move per cpu cpu_core_map " Kevin Winchester
2012-02-22 23:32 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] x86: Remove #ifdef CONFIG_SMP sections by moving smp_num_siblings into common.c Kevin Winchester
2012-02-22 23:43 ` [PATCH v3 0/5] x86: Cleanup and simplify cpu-specific data Kevin Winchester
2012-02-23 7:32 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-02-22 1:45 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] x86: Move per cpu cpu_llc_id to a field in struct cpuinfo_x86 Kevin Winchester
2012-02-22 1:45 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] x86: Move per cpu cpu_sibling_map " Kevin Winchester
2012-02-22 1:45 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] x86: Move per cpu cpu_core_map " Kevin Winchester
2012-02-22 1:45 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] x86: Remove #ifdef CONFIG_SMP sections by moving smp_num_siblings into common.c Kevin Winchester
2012-02-12 11:23 ` [PATCH] x86: Move per cpu cpu_llc_shared_map to a field in struct cpuinfo_x86 Borislav Petkov
2012-02-12 0:31 ` MCE, AMD: Hide smp-only code around CONFIG_SMP Kevin Winchester
2012-02-22 16:13 ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86/mce/AMD: Fix UP build error tip-bot for Borislav Petkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120209080648.GI18387@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kjwinchester@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nbowler@elliptictech.com \
--cc=rdunlap@xenotime.net \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).