From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
paul@paulmenage.org, rjw@sisk.pl, tj@kernel.org,
frank.rowand@am.sony.com, pjt@google.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
lizf@cn.fujitsu.com, prashanth@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
"akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] CPU hotplug, cpusets: Fix CPU online handling related to cpusets
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 12:39:29 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120213203929.GQ2864@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F394CC9.6010103@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 11:17:53PM +0530, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
> On 02/10/2012 10:23 PM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 04:52:07PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> >> On Thu, 2012-02-09 at 16:11 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >>
> >>>> My understanding of the code is that when a CPU is taken
> >>>> offline, it is removed from all the cpusets and then the
> >>>> scan_for_empty_cpusets() function is run to move tasks from
> >>>> empty cpusets to their parent cpusets.
> >>>
> >>> Why is that done that way? offlining a CPU should be an
> >>> invariant as far as cpusets are concerned.
> >>
> >> Can't, tasks need to run someplace. There's two choices, add a still
> >> online cpu to the now empty cpuset or move the tasks to a parent that
> >> still has online cpus.
> >>
> >> Both are destructive.
> >
> > OK, I will ask the stupid question... Hey, somebody has to! ;-)
> >
> > Would it make sense for offlining the last CPU in a cpuset to be
> > destructive, but to allow offlining of a non-last CPU to be reversible?
> >
> > For example, assume that cpuset A has CPUs 0 and 1, and cpuset B has
> > 1, 2, and 3. Then offlining any single CPU and then onlining it would
> > restore the cpusets to their original state. Offlining both CPUs 0 and 1
> > would be destructive to cpuset A, so that onlining those two CPUs would
> > leave any tasks in cpuset A in some ancestor of cpuset A, and would
> > leave cpuset A with no assigned CPUs. However, that same operation
> > (offlining both CPUs 0 and 1, then onlining them) would restore cpuset
> > B to its original state, covering CPUs 1, 2, and 3.
>
> But how would this scheme help us? During suspend, all non-boot CPUs are
> taken offline. Which means, it would be destructive to any cpuset that
> didn't originally contain CPU0 (even when using the above scheme). So, upon
> resume, it is still not the same as how it was before suspend.
Yep, it would only help for incremental cases. Or if all cpusets had
CPU 0 in them. So preserving cpusets across suspend will require a
bigger hammer.
Thanx, Paul
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-13 20:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-07 18:55 [PATCH 0/4] CPU hotplug, cpusets: Fix CPU online handling related to cpusets Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-02-07 18:56 ` [PATCH 1/4] CPU hotplug, cpuset: Maintain a copy of the cpus_allowed mask before CPU hotplug Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-02-07 18:56 ` [PATCH 2/4] cpuset: Split up update_cpumask() so that its functionality can be reused Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-02-07 18:57 ` [PATCH 3/4] cpuset: Add function to introduce CPUs to cpusets during CPU online Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-02-07 18:57 ` [PATCH 4/4] CPU hotplug, cpusets: Differentiate the CPU online and CPU offline callbacks Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-02-08 3:22 ` [PATCH 0/4] CPU hotplug, cpusets: Fix CPU online handling related to cpusets Peter Zijlstra
2012-02-08 6:33 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-02-09 7:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-02-09 8:42 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-02-09 15:11 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-02-10 15:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-02-10 16:53 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-10 17:34 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-02-10 21:51 ` Alan Stern
2012-02-10 22:39 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-02-11 2:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-02-11 4:26 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-02-13 17:47 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-02-17 12:15 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-02-20 12:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-02-20 12:59 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-02-23 9:57 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-02-24 23:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-02-27 10:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-02-27 12:09 ` [tip:sched/urgent] CPU hotplug, cpusets, suspend: Don' t touch cpusets during suspend/resume tip-bot for Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-02-11 16:00 ` [PATCH 0/4] CPU hotplug, cpusets: Fix CPU online handling related to cpusets Paul E. McKenney
2012-02-13 17:47 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-02-13 20:39 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2012-02-13 20:49 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-02-11 13:39 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-02-10 15:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-02-09 16:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120213203929.GQ2864@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=frank.rowand@am.sony.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=paul@paulmenage.org \
--cc=pjt@google.com \
--cc=prashanth@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).