From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754257Ab2BQUTH (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Feb 2012 15:19:07 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:34715 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751050Ab2BQUTF (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Feb 2012 15:19:05 -0500 Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 15:18:42 -0500 From: Don Zickus To: HATAYAMA Daisuke Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" , Yinghai Lu , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org, vgoyal@redhat.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@elte.hu, linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org, "d.hatayama" Subject: Re: [tip:x86/debug] x86/kdump: No need to disable ioapic/ lapic in crash path Message-ID: <20120217201842.GP9751@redhat.com> References: <20120216172735.GX9751@redhat.com> <20120216215603.GH9751@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 12:49:16AM +0900, HATAYAMA Daisuke wrote: > A few days ago I investigted the case where system is reseted due to > triple fault caused by the NMI after idt is disabled in > machine_kexec. I didn't see the reset when trigering the kdump with > NMI since the NMI is masked until next iret instruction executed as > described in 6.7.2. Handling Multiple NMIs of Intel Manual Vol.3A. > The NMI mask remains untill the first iret execution on the 2nd > kernel: just the return path of the first kernel_thread invocation for > init process. The exact path is: hmm. So even though the local apic was disabled you still got an NMI? That could have been from an external NMI. I forget how that is wired up, if it goes through the IOAPIC to the Local APIC or directly to the NMI pin on the cpu. > > switch_to > -> ret_from_fork > -> int_ret_from_sys_call > -> retint_restore_args > -> irq_return > > At that phase idt is already set up and kdump works. > > From the discussion I interpret kdump doesn't assume this behaviour, > right? probably not. > > BTW, does anyone know the detail of the NMI mask? I couldn't figure > out about it from the Intel spec more than ``certain hardware > conditions''... I expect those who look at here are x86 NMI experts. I don't understand the question. Cheers, Don