From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Cc: axboe@kernel.dk, hughd@google.com, avi@redhat.com,
nate@cpanel.net, cl@linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dpshah@google.com,
ctalbott@google.com, rni@google.com,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET] mempool, percpu, blkcg: fix percpu stat allocation and remove stats_lock
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 06:44:21 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120225214421.GA3401@dhcp-172-17-108-109.mtv.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120224142033.GA5095@redhat.com>
Hello, Vivek.
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 09:20:33AM -0500, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> Ok. I will write a patch. Things have changed a lot since last time.
> I think there is only one tricky part and that is waiting for any
> scheduled work to finish during blkg destruction. Because group destruction
> happens under both queue and blkcg spin locks, I think I will have to take
> the group off list, drop locks, wait for worker thread to finish and then
> take locks again and walk through list again to kill remaining groups.
Rather than embedding work_struct into blkg and tying work and blkg
destruction, why not just create a spinlock protected alloc-pending
list? On blkg creation, link blkg onto that list and kick shared work
item and on destruction, just unlink it. Worker function can walk the
list and try to alloc for all and reschedule if alloc fails.
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-25 21:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-23 22:30 [PATCHSET] mempool, percpu, blkcg: fix percpu stat allocation and remove stats_lock Tejun Heo
2012-02-23 22:30 ` [PATCH 1/8] mempool: factor out mempool_fill() Tejun Heo
2012-02-23 22:30 ` [PATCH 2/8] mempool: separate out __mempool_create() Tejun Heo
2012-02-23 22:30 ` [PATCH 3/8] mempool, percpu: implement percpu mempool Tejun Heo
2012-02-23 22:30 ` [PATCH 4/8] block: fix deadlock through percpu allocation in blk-cgroup Tejun Heo
2012-02-23 22:30 ` [PATCH 5/8] blkcg: don't use percpu for merged stats Tejun Heo
2012-02-23 22:30 ` [PATCH 6/8] blkcg: simplify stat reset Tejun Heo
2012-02-23 22:30 ` [PATCH 7/8] blkcg: restructure blkio_get_stat() Tejun Heo
2012-02-23 22:30 ` [PATCH 8/8] blkcg: remove blkio_group->stats_lock Tejun Heo
2012-02-23 22:43 ` [PATCHSET] mempool, percpu, blkcg: fix percpu stat allocation and remove stats_lock Andrew Morton
2012-02-23 23:01 ` Tejun Heo
2012-02-23 23:12 ` Tejun Heo
2012-02-23 23:22 ` Andrew Morton
2012-02-23 23:24 ` Tejun Heo
2012-02-24 14:20 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-02-25 21:44 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2012-02-27 3:11 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-02-27 9:11 ` Tejun Heo
2012-02-27 19:43 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-02-29 17:36 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-03-05 22:13 ` Tejun Heo
2012-03-06 21:09 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-03-06 21:20 ` Andrew Morton
2012-03-06 21:34 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-03-06 21:55 ` Andrew Morton
2012-03-07 14:55 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-03-07 17:05 ` Tejun Heo
2012-03-07 19:13 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-03-07 19:22 ` Tejun Heo
2012-03-07 19:42 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-03-07 22:56 ` Tejun Heo
2012-03-07 23:08 ` Andrew Morton
2012-03-07 23:15 ` Tejun Heo
2012-03-07 23:05 ` Andrew Morton
2012-03-08 17:57 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-03-08 18:08 ` Tejun Heo
2012-03-08 18:11 ` Tejun Heo
2012-03-08 18:22 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-03-08 18:27 ` Tejun Heo
2012-03-15 16:48 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-03-15 16:59 ` Tejun Heo
2012-03-20 11:50 ` Jens Axboe
2012-03-08 20:16 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-03-08 20:33 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-03-08 20:35 ` Tejun Heo
2012-03-08 19:06 ` Andrew Morton
2012-02-25 3:44 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-02-25 21:46 ` Tejun Heo
2012-02-25 22:21 ` Tejun Heo
2012-02-27 14:25 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-02-27 14:40 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-03-05 17:45 ` Tejun Heo
2012-02-27 18:22 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-02-29 19:03 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-03-05 17:20 ` Tejun Heo
2012-03-05 18:03 ` Vivek Goyal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120225214421.GA3401@dhcp-172-17-108-109.mtv.corp.google.com \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ctalbott@google.com \
--cc=dpshah@google.com \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nate@cpanel.net \
--cc=rni@google.com \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).