From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1031237Ab2COAGU (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Mar 2012 20:06:20 -0400 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:33538 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1031223Ab2COAGT (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Mar 2012 20:06:19 -0400 Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 17:06:18 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Hugh Dickins Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Konstantin Khlebnikov , Linus Torvalds , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] radix-tree: iterating general cleanup Message-Id: <20120314170618.ae51230b.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20120207074905.29797.60353.stgit@zurg> <20120314073629.GA17016@infradead.org> <4F604D81.1060607@openvz.org> <20120314075109.GA32717@infradead.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.0.2 (GTK+ 2.20.1; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 14 Mar 2012 12:36:11 -0700 (PDT) Hugh Dickins wrote: > On Wed, 14 Mar 2012, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 11:49:21AM +0400, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote: > > > Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > >Any updates on this series? Linus took an interest, so I went to sleep. It seems that a role reversal is in order ;) > > > I had sent "[PATCH v2 0/3] radix-tree: general iterator" February 10, there is no more updates after that. > > > I just checked v2 on top "next-20120314" -- looks like all ok. > > > > this was more a question to the MM maintainers if this is getting > > merged or if there were any further comments. > > I haven't studied the code at all - I'm afraid Konstantin is rather > more productive than I can keep up with, and other bugs and patches > appeared to be more urgent and important. I'll take a look. > And I made a patch for the > radix-tree test harness which akpm curates, to update its radix-tree.c > to Konstantin's: those tests ran perfectly on 64-bit and on 32-bit. > That patch to rtth appended below. Thanks. > (I do have, or expect to have once I study them, reservations about > his subsequent changes to radix-tree usage in mm/shmem.c; and even > if I end up agreeing with his changes, would prefer to hold them off > until after the tmpfs fallocation mods are in - other work which > had to yield to higher priorities, ready but not yet commented.) OK, I shall forget all about that followup series this time around.