From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@sgi.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] rcu: Limit GP initialization to CPUs that have been online
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 10:02:36 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120315170236.GF2381@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1331780831.14263.15.camel@marge.simpson.net>
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 04:07:11AM +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-03-15 at 03:42 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > On Wed, 2012-03-14 at 09:56 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> >
> > > Does the following work better? It does pass my fake-big-system tests
> > > (more testing in the works).
> >
> > Yup, tip booted fine. Thanks! I'll test, see if it gets upset.
>
> Wedged into 3.0 enterprise booted fine too, is now running rcutorture.
> I'll add hotplug after it runs explosion free for a while. Any
> suggestions for giving both virgin and 3.0 a thorough trouncing?
It would be good to check the latency of RCU's grace-period
initialization, and comparing the results with and without this patch.
Dimitri might have scripting for that.
Thanx, Paul
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-15 17:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-14 0:24 [PATCH RFC] rcu: Limit GP initialization to CPUs that have been online Paul E. McKenney
2012-03-14 9:24 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-03-14 12:40 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-03-14 13:08 ` Dimitri Sivanich
2012-03-14 15:17 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-03-14 16:56 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-03-15 2:42 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-03-15 3:07 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-03-15 17:02 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2012-03-15 17:21 ` Dimitri Sivanich
2012-03-16 4:45 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-03-15 17:59 ` Dimitri Sivanich
2012-03-16 7:27 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-03-16 8:09 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-03-16 8:45 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-03-16 17:28 ` Dimitri Sivanich
2012-03-16 17:51 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-03-16 17:56 ` Dimitri Sivanich
2012-03-16 19:11 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-03-22 15:35 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-03-22 20:24 ` Dimitri Sivanich
2012-03-23 4:48 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-03-23 19:23 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-04-11 11:04 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-04-13 18:42 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-04-14 5:42 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-03-15 17:58 ` Dimitri Sivanich
2012-03-15 18:23 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-03-15 21:07 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-03-16 15:46 ` Dimitri Sivanich
2012-03-16 17:21 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-03-14 17:07 ` Mike Galbraith
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120315170236.GF2381@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sivanich@sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).