From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1751739Ab2DBJyu (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Mon, 2 Apr 2012 05:54:50 -0400
Received: from mail-bk0-f46.google.com ([209.85.214.46]:63094 "EHLO
	mail-bk0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751075Ab2DBJys (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 2 Apr 2012 05:54:48 -0400
Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2012 13:54:44 +0400
From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@openvz.org>
To: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@openvz.org>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>, "linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>,
        "linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org" 
	<linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>,
        "oprofile-list@lists.sf.net" <oprofile-list@lists.sf.net>,
        Matt Helsley <matthltc@us.ibm.com>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] mm: kill vma flag VM_EXECUTABLE
Message-ID: <20120402095444.GE7607@moon>
References: <20120331091049.19373.28994.stgit@zurg>
 <20120331092929.19920.54540.stgit@zurg>
 <20120331201324.GA17565@redhat.com>
 <20120331203912.GB687@moon>
 <4F79755B.3030703@openvz.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4F79755B.3030703@openvz.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 01:46:03PM +0400, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
> Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> >On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 10:13:24PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> >>
> >>Add Cyrill. This conflicts with
> >>c-r-prctl-add-ability-to-set-new-mm_struct-exe_file.patch in -mm.
> >
> >Thanks for CC'ing, Oleg. I think if thise series go in it won't
> >be a problem to update my patch accordingly.
> 
> In this patch I leave mm->exe_file lockless.
> After exec/fork we can change it only for current task and only if mm->mm_users == 1.
> 
> something like this:
> 
> task_lock(current);
> if (atomic_read(&current->mm->mm_users) == 1)
> 	set_mm_exe_file(current->mm, new_file);
> else
> 	ret = -EBUSY;
> task_unlock(current);
> 
> task_lock() protect this code against get_task_mm()

I see. Konstantin, the question is what is more convenient way to update the
patch in linux-next. The c-r-prctl-add-ability-to-set-new-mm_struct-exe_file.patch
is in -mm already, so I either should wait until Andrew pick your series up and
send updating patch on top, or I could fetch your series, update my patch and
send it here as reply. Hmm?

	Cyrill