From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752878Ab2DBQG6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Apr 2012 12:06:58 -0400 Received: from ch1ehsobe005.messaging.microsoft.com ([216.32.181.185]:16091 "EHLO ch1outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752243Ab2DBQG4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Apr 2012 12:06:56 -0400 X-SpamScore: -1 X-BigFish: VPS-1(zz4015Izz1202hzz8275bh8275dhz2dh668h839h944hd25h) X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:163.181.249.109;KIP:(null);UIP:(null);IPV:NLI;H:ausb3twp02.amd.com;RD:none;EFVD:NLI X-WSS-ID: 0M1V0RB-02-H4D-02 X-M-MSG: Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2012 18:06:48 +0200 From: Andreas Herrmann To: Ingo Molnar CC: , , , , , , , Subject: [PATCH resend] x86/platform: Remove incorrect error message in x86_default_fixup_cpu_id() Message-ID: <20120402160648.GR27684@alberich.amd.com> References: <20120224153127.GD28921@alberich.amd.com> <20120302110440.GA24019@elte.hu> <20120302115130.GA17876@alberich.amd.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120302115130.GA17876@alberich.amd.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-OriginatorOrg: amd.com Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org It's only called from amd.c:srat_detect_node(). The introduced condition for calling the fixup code is true for all AMD multi-node processors, e.g. Magny-Cours and Interlagos. There we have 2 NUMA nodes on one socket. Thus there are cores having different numa-node-id but with equal phys_proc_id. There is no point to print error messages in such a situation. The confusing/misleading error message was introduced with commit 64be4c1c2428e148de6081af235e2418e6a66dda (x86: Add x86_init platform override to fix up NUMA core numbering). Remove the default fixup function (especially the error message) and replace it by a NULL pointer check, move the Numascale-specific condition for calling the fixup into the fixup-function itself and slightly adapt the comment. Cc: Signed-off-by: Andreas Herrmann --- arch/x86/include/asm/x86_init.h | 1 - arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic_numachip.c | 7 +++++-- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c | 7 ++++--- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c | 9 --------- arch/x86/kernel/x86_init.c | 1 - 5 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) This patch didn't make it into v3.3. But the misleading error message introduced with numachip support was merged. Please apply this patch. Thanks, Andreas diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/x86_init.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/x86_init.h index baaca8d..764b66a 100644 --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/x86_init.h +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/x86_init.h @@ -195,6 +195,5 @@ extern struct x86_msi_ops x86_msi; extern void x86_init_noop(void); extern void x86_init_uint_noop(unsigned int unused); -extern void x86_default_fixup_cpu_id(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c, int node); #endif diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic_numachip.c b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic_numachip.c index 899803e..23e7542 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic_numachip.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic_numachip.c @@ -207,8 +207,11 @@ static void __init map_csrs(void) static void fixup_cpu_id(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c, int node) { - c->phys_proc_id = node; - per_cpu(cpu_llc_id, smp_processor_id()) = node; + + if (c->phys_proc_id != node) { + c->phys_proc_id = node; + per_cpu(cpu_llc_id, smp_processor_id()) = node; + } } static int __init numachip_system_init(void) diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c index 0a44b90..c8fd678 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c @@ -353,10 +353,11 @@ static void __cpuinit srat_detect_node(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c) node = per_cpu(cpu_llc_id, cpu); /* - * If core numbers are inconsistent, it's likely a multi-fabric platform, - * so invoke platform-specific handler + * On multi-fabric platform (e.g. Numascale NumaChip) a + * platform-specific handler needs to be called to fixup some + * IDs of the CPU. */ - if (c->phys_proc_id != node) + if (x86_cpuinit.fixup_cpu_id) x86_cpuinit.fixup_cpu_id(c, node); if (!node_online(node)) { diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c index 67e2583..cf79302 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c @@ -1163,15 +1163,6 @@ static void dbg_restore_debug_regs(void) #endif /* ! CONFIG_KGDB */ /* - * Prints an error where the NUMA and configured core-number mismatch and the - * platform didn't override this to fix it up - */ -void __cpuinit x86_default_fixup_cpu_id(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c, int node) -{ - pr_err("NUMA core number %d differs from configured core number %d\n", node, c->phys_proc_id); -} - -/* * cpu_init() initializes state that is per-CPU. Some data is already * initialized (naturally) in the bootstrap process, such as the GDT * and IDT. We reload them nevertheless, this function acts as a diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/x86_init.c b/arch/x86/kernel/x86_init.c index e9f265f..9cf71d0 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/x86_init.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/x86_init.c @@ -93,7 +93,6 @@ struct x86_init_ops x86_init __initdata = { struct x86_cpuinit_ops x86_cpuinit __cpuinitdata = { .early_percpu_clock_init = x86_init_noop, .setup_percpu_clockev = setup_secondary_APIC_clock, - .fixup_cpu_id = x86_default_fixup_cpu_id, }; static void default_nmi_init(void) { }; -- 1.7.8.5