From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Roland McGrath <roland@hack.frob.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME, arch/*/*/*signal*.c and all such
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 16:52:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120425145239.GA21386@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120425133238.GG6871@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
On 04/25, Al Viro wrote:
>
> Point... Still, since we are talking about an arbitrary wide window (the
> damn thing is waiting for signals to arrive, after all) this doesn't
> sound good;
> ...
> IMO it's
> a QoI problem at the very least.
and looks confusing, agreed.
> As for SA_RESTART/!SA_RESTART mixes, if SA_RESTART comes first we should
> just take that restart and pretend that the second signal has arrived at
> the very beginning of handler, I think.
Yes. My point was, this confuses the user-space developers too. And this
case is equally unclear to me wrt should we (at least try to) change this
or not.
Oleg.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-25 14:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 91+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-18 13:04 [PULL REQUEST] : ima-appraisal patches Mimi Zohar
2012-04-18 15:02 ` James Morris
2012-04-18 18:07 ` Mimi Zohar
2012-04-18 18:39 ` Al Viro
2012-04-18 20:56 ` Mimi Zohar
2012-04-19 19:57 ` Mimi Zohar
2012-04-20 0:43 ` [RFC] situation with fput() locking (was Re: [PULL REQUEST] : ima-appraisal patches) Al Viro
2012-04-20 2:31 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-04-20 2:54 ` Al Viro
2012-04-20 2:58 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-04-20 8:09 ` Al Viro
2012-04-20 15:56 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-04-20 16:08 ` Al Viro
2012-04-20 16:42 ` Al Viro
2012-04-20 17:21 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-04-20 18:07 ` Al Viro
2012-04-23 18:01 ` [RFC] TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME, arch/*/*/*signal*.c and all such Al Viro
2012-04-23 18:37 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-24 7:26 ` Al Viro
2012-04-25 3:06 ` Al Viro
2012-04-25 12:37 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-25 12:50 ` Al Viro
2012-04-25 13:03 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-25 13:32 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-25 13:32 ` Al Viro
2012-04-25 14:52 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2012-04-25 15:46 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-25 16:10 ` Al Viro
2012-04-25 17:02 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-25 17:51 ` Al Viro
2012-04-26 7:15 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2012-04-26 7:25 ` David Miller
2012-04-26 13:52 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-26 14:31 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2012-04-26 13:22 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-26 18:37 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-26 23:19 ` Al Viro
2012-04-27 17:24 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-27 17:54 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-05-02 10:37 ` Matt Fleming
2012-05-02 14:14 ` Al Viro
2012-04-27 18:45 ` Al Viro
2012-04-27 19:14 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2012-04-27 19:34 ` Al Viro
2012-04-29 22:51 ` Al Viro
2012-04-30 6:39 ` Greg Ungerer
2012-04-27 19:42 ` Al Viro
2012-04-27 20:20 ` Roland McGrath
2012-04-27 21:12 ` Al Viro
2012-04-27 21:27 ` Roland McGrath
2012-04-27 23:15 ` Al Viro
2012-04-27 23:32 ` Al Viro
2012-04-29 4:12 ` Al Viro
2012-04-30 8:06 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2012-04-27 23:50 ` Al Viro
2012-04-28 18:51 ` [PATCH] arch/tile: avoid calling do_signal() after fork from a kernel thread Chris Metcalf
2012-04-28 20:55 ` Al Viro
2012-04-28 21:46 ` Chris Metcalf
2012-04-29 0:55 ` Al Viro
2012-04-28 18:51 ` [PATCH v2] arch/tile: fix up some issues in calling do_work_pending() Chris Metcalf
2012-04-29 3:49 ` [PATCH] arch/tile: avoid calling do_signal() after fork from a kernel thread Chris Metcalf
2012-04-28 2:42 ` [RFC] TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME, arch/*/*/*signal*.c and all such Al Viro
2012-04-28 3:32 ` Al Viro
2012-04-28 3:36 ` Al Viro
2012-04-29 16:33 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-29 16:18 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-29 18:05 ` Al Viro
2012-05-01 4:31 ` Al Viro
2012-05-01 5:06 ` Mike Frysinger
2012-05-01 5:52 ` Al Viro
2012-05-02 17:24 ` Al Viro
2012-05-02 18:30 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-29 16:41 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-29 18:09 ` Al Viro
2012-04-29 18:25 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-20 3:15 ` [RFC] situation with fput() locking (was Re: [PULL REQUEST] : ima-appraisal patches) Al Viro
2012-04-20 18:54 ` Hugh Dickins
2012-04-20 19:04 ` Al Viro
2012-04-20 19:18 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-04-20 19:32 ` Hugh Dickins
2012-04-20 19:58 ` Al Viro
2012-04-20 21:12 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-04-20 22:13 ` Al Viro
2012-04-20 22:35 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-04-27 7:35 ` Kasatkin, Dmitry
2012-04-27 17:34 ` Al Viro
2012-04-27 18:52 ` Kasatkin, Dmitry
2012-04-27 19:15 ` Kasatkin, Dmitry
2012-04-30 14:32 ` Mimi Zohar
2012-05-03 4:23 ` James Morris
2012-04-20 19:37 ` Al Viro
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120425145239.GA21386@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=roland@hack.frob.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).