From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755264Ab2DZIjg (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Apr 2012 04:39:36 -0400 Received: from metis.ext.pengutronix.de ([92.198.50.35]:55065 "EHLO metis.ext.pengutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754481Ab2DZIjd (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Apr 2012 04:39:33 -0400 Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 10:39:24 +0200 From: Sascha Hauer To: Saravana Kannan Cc: Mike Turquette , Arnd Bergman , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Lunn , Rob Herring , Russell King , Jeremy Kerr , Thomas Gleixner , Paul Walmsley , Shawn Guo , Jamie Iles , Richard Zhao , Magnus Damm , Mark Brown , Linus Walleij , Stephen Boyd , Amit Kucheria , Deepak Saxena , Grant Likely Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: Use a separate struct for holding init data. Message-ID: <20120426083924.GE17184@pengutronix.de> References: <1335419936-10881-1-git-send-email-skannan@codeaurora.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1335419936-10881-1-git-send-email-skannan@codeaurora.org> X-Sent-From: Pengutronix Hildesheim X-URL: http://www.pengutronix.de/ X-IRC: #ptxdist @freenode X-Accept-Language: de,en X-Accept-Content-Type: text/plain X-Uptime: 10:30:59 up 165 days, 16:18, 43 users, load average: 0.00, 0.03, 0.05 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2001:6f8:1178:2:21e:67ff:fe11:9c5c X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: sha@pengutronix.de X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on metis.ext.pengutronix.de); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-PTX-Original-Recipient: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 10:58:56PM -0700, Saravana Kannan wrote: > Create a struct clk_init_data to hold all data that needs to be passed from > the platfrom specific driver to the common clock framework during clock > registration. Add a pointer to this struct inside clk_hw. > > This has several advantages: > * Completely hides struct clk from many clock platform drivers and static > clock initialization code that don't care for static initialization of > the struct clks. > * For platforms that want to do complete static initialization, it removed > the need to directly mess with the struct clk's fields while still > allowing to statically allocate struct clk. This keeps the code more > future proof even if they include clk-private.h. > * Simplifies the generic clk_register() function and allows adding optional > fields in the future without modifying the function signature. > * Simplifies the static initialization of clocks on all platforms by > removing the need for forward delcarations or convoluted macros. Can we please stop messing with the function prototypes? So you prefer passing a struct to clk_register which is fine and yes, it may have advantages. But do we really need to change the prototype? Why can't we just add a new function? I am generally open to do these changes, but we have come to the point where people actually want to *use* the clock framework instead of rebasing their stuff onto the latest patches. Sascha -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |