From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758179Ab2EATCu (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 May 2012 15:02:50 -0400 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:59403 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751846Ab2EATCt (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 May 2012 15:02:49 -0400 Date: Tue, 1 May 2012 12:02:46 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Johannes Weiner Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Rik van Riel , Andrea Arcangeli , Peter Zijlstra , Mel Gorman , Minchan Kim , Hugh Dickins , KOSAKI Motohiro , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch 2/5] mm + fs: prepare for non-page entries in page cache Message-Id: <20120501120246.83d2ce28.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <1335861713-4573-3-git-send-email-hannes@cmpxchg.org> References: <1335861713-4573-1-git-send-email-hannes@cmpxchg.org> <1335861713-4573-3-git-send-email-hannes@cmpxchg.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.0.2 (GTK+ 2.20.1; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 1 May 2012 10:41:50 +0200 Johannes Weiner wrote: > --- a/fs/inode.c > +++ b/fs/inode.c > @@ -544,8 +544,7 @@ static void evict(struct inode *inode) > if (op->evict_inode) { > op->evict_inode(inode); > } else { > - if (inode->i_data.nrpages) > - truncate_inode_pages(&inode->i_data, 0); > + truncate_inode_pages(&inode->i_data, 0); Why did we lose this optimisation?