From: Stanislav Kinsbursky <skinsbursky@parallels.com>
To: bfields@fieldses.org, Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
devel@openvz.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 0/2] SUNRPC: separate per-net data creation from service
Date: Wed, 02 May 2012 16:08:29 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120502120536.8794.22210.stgit@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
creation
v3: "SUNRPC: new svc_bind() routine introduced" patch was squashed with the
"SUNRPC: check rpcbind clients usage counter before decrement" patch.
v2: Increase per-net usage counted in lockd_up_net().
This is a cleanup patch set.
It will be followed my LockD start/stop cleanup patch set and NFS callback
service containerization patch set (yes, I forgot to implement it).
Today per-net data is created with service, and then is service is starting in
other network namespace. And thus it's destroyed with service too. Moreover,
network context for destroying of per-net data is taken from current process.
This is correct, but code looks ugly.
This patch set separates per-net data allocation from service allocation and
destruction.
IOW, per-net data have to be destroyed by service users - not service itself.
BTW, NFSd code become uglier with this patch set. Sorry.
But I assume, that these new ugly parts will be replaced later by NFSd service
containerization code.
The following series implements...
---
Stanislav Kinsbursky (2):
SUNRPC: new svc_bind() routine introduced
SUNRPC: move per-net operations from svc_destroy()
fs/lockd/svc.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++------------
fs/nfs/callback.c | 11 +++++++++++
fs/nfsd/nfsctl.c | 4 ++++
fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
include/linux/sunrpc/svc.h | 1 +
net/sunrpc/rpcb_clnt.c | 12 +++++++-----
net/sunrpc/svc.c | 23 ++++++++++-------------
7 files changed, 70 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
next reply other threads:[~2012-05-02 12:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-02 12:08 Stanislav Kinsbursky [this message]
2012-05-02 12:08 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] SUNRPC: new svc_bind() routine introduced Stanislav Kinsbursky
2012-05-02 12:08 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] SUNRPC: move per-net operations from svc_destroy() Stanislav Kinsbursky
2012-05-04 8:49 ` [PATCH v4] " Stanislav Kinsbursky
2012-05-02 21:58 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] SUNRPC: separate per-net data creation from service J. Bruce Fields
2012-05-03 14:27 ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-05-04 8:43 ` Stanislav Kinsbursky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120502120536.8794.22210.stgit@localhost.localdomain \
--to=skinsbursky@parallels.com \
--cc=Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=devel@openvz.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).