From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757447Ab2ECPAy (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 May 2012 11:00:54 -0400 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:43895 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757247Ab2ECPAw (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 May 2012 11:00:52 -0400 Date: Thu, 3 May 2012 16:00:48 +0100 From: Mel Gorman To: Andrew Morton Cc: Linux-MM , Linux-Netdev , LKML , David Miller , Neil Brown , Peter Zijlstra , Mike Christie , Eric B Munson Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/16] Swap-over-NBD without deadlocking V9 Message-ID: <20120503150048.GI11435@suse.de> References: <1334578624-23257-1-git-send-email-mgorman@suse.de> <20120501152826.b970a098.akpm@linux-foundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120501152826.b970a098.akpm@linux-foundation.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, May 01, 2012 at 03:28:26PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > This patchset is far less ghastly than I feared/remembered/dreamed ;) > That might be the best comment the series ever received :) > The mm parts, anyway. Are the net guys on board with it all? They are cc'd but have not given any feedback in a while. That could be because they are happy with it or because if they felt the MM parts were blocking the series then it was unnecessary to review the network parts. Any of the networking people care to comment? -- Mel Gorman SUSE Labs