From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757892Ab2EGTrF (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 May 2012 15:47:05 -0400 Received: from mail-pz0-f51.google.com ([209.85.210.51]:62402 "EHLO mail-pz0-f51.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757834Ab2EGTrE (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 May 2012 15:47:04 -0400 Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 12:46:58 -0700 From: Tejun Heo To: Alan Stern Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" , Peter Zijlstra , Kernel development list Subject: Re: Lockdep false positive in sysfs Message-ID: <20120507194658.GH19417@google.com> References: <20120504165232.GB24639@google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello, Alan. On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 03:08:53PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote: > @@ -588,10 +591,15 @@ static ssize_t usb_dev_authorized_store( > result = sscanf(buf, "%u\n", &val); > if (result != 1) > result = -EINVAL; > - else if (val == 0) > + else if (val == 0) { > + void *cookie; > + > + cookie = device_start_attribute_infanticide(dev, attr, NULL); > result = usb_deauthorize_device(usb_dev); > - else > + device_end_attribute_infanticide(cookie); > + } else { > result = usb_authorize_device(usb_dev); > + } I *think* it looks way too huge as lockdep workaround. We're adding a whole separate lookup interface for this. If looking up afterwards is difficult, can't we get away with adding a field in struct attribute? Thanks. -- tejun