linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
To: Anton Vorontsov <anton.vorontsov@linaro.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
	Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
	Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	uclinux-dist-devel@blackfin.uclinux.org,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
	user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, patches@linaro.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/9] blackfin: A couple of task->mm handling fixes
Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2012 00:36:35 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201206010036.40468.vapier@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120423070901.GE30752@lizard>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: Text/Plain, Size: 1106 bytes --]

On Monday 23 April 2012 03:09:01 Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> 1. Working with task->mm w/o getting mm or grabing the task lock is
>    dangerous as ->mm might disappear (exit_mm() assigns NULL under
>    task_lock(), so tasklist lock is not enough).

that isn't a problem for this code as it specifically checks if it's in an 
atomic section.  if it is, then task->mm can't go away on us.

>    We can't use get_task_mm()/mmput() pair as mmput() might sleep,
>    so we have to take the task lock while handle its mm.

if we're not in an atomic section, then sleeping is fine.

> 2. Checking for process->mm is not enough because process' main
>    thread may exit or detach its mm via use_mm(), but other threads
>    may still have a valid mm.

i don't think it matters for this code (per the reasons above).

>    To catch this we use find_lock_task_mm(), which walks up all
>    threads and returns an appropriate task (with task lock held).

certainly fine for the non-atomic code path.  i guess we'll notice in crashes 
if it causes a problem in atomic code paths as well.
-mike

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2012-06-01  4:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-04-23  7:06 [PATCH v3 0/9] Fixes for common mistakes w/ for_each_process and task->mm Anton Vorontsov
2012-04-23  7:07 ` [PATCH 1/9] cpu: Introduce clear_tasks_mm_cpumask() helper Anton Vorontsov
2012-04-26 23:59   ` Andrew Morton
2012-05-01 10:45     ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-05  1:47       ` [PATCH] cpu: Document clear_tasks_mm_cpumask() Anton Vorontsov
2012-05-05  1:47     ` [PATCH 1/9] cpu: Introduce clear_tasks_mm_cpumask() helper Anton Vorontsov
2012-04-23  7:08 ` [PATCH 2/9] arm: Use clear_tasks_mm_cpumask() Anton Vorontsov
2012-04-23  7:08 ` [PATCH 3/9] powerpc: " Anton Vorontsov
2012-04-23  7:08 ` [PATCH 4/9] sh: " Anton Vorontsov
2012-04-23  7:09 ` [PATCH 5/9] blackfin: A couple of task->mm handling fixes Anton Vorontsov
2012-06-01  4:36   ` Mike Frysinger [this message]
2012-04-23  7:09 ` [PATCH 6/9] blackfin: Fix possible deadlock in decode_address() Anton Vorontsov
2012-04-23  7:09 ` [PATCH 7/9] um: Should hold tasklist_lock while traversing processes Anton Vorontsov
2012-04-23 14:57   ` Richard Weinberger
2012-04-23 15:40     ` Anton Vorontsov
2012-04-23  7:09 ` [PATCH 8/9] um: Fix possible race on task->mm Anton Vorontsov
2012-04-23  7:09 ` [PATCH 9/9] um: Properly check all process' threads for a live mm Anton Vorontsov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201206010036.40468.vapier@gentoo.org \
    --to=vapier@gentoo.org \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=anton.vorontsov@linaro.org \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
    --cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=lethal@linux-sh.org \
    --cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=patches@linaro.org \
    --cc=richard@nod.at \
    --cc=uclinux-dist-devel@blackfin.uclinux.org \
    --cc=user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).