From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759415Ab2FAK6J (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Jun 2012 06:58:09 -0400 Received: from mho-01-ewr.mailhop.org ([204.13.248.71]:39377 "EHLO mho-01-ewr.mailhop.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758982Ab2FAK6H (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Jun 2012 06:58:07 -0400 X-Mail-Handler: MailHop Outbound by DynDNS X-Originating-IP: 98.234.237.12 X-Report-Abuse-To: abuse@dyndns.com (see http://www.dyndns.com/services/mailhop/outbound_abuse.html for abuse reporting information) X-MHO-User: U2FsdGVkX19gqISF+pmE9I4cYdST7g6f Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2012 03:58:00 -0700 From: Tony Lindgren To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: "ABRAHAM, KISHON VIJAY" , paul@pwsan.com, linux@arm.linux.org.uk, b-cousson@ti.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, balbi@ti.com Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] omap: add ocp2scp as a misc driver Message-ID: <20120601105759.GJ12766@atomide.com> References: <1338375394-16268-1-git-send-email-kishon@ti.com> <201205301843.51568.arnd@arndb.de> <201205310922.18550.arnd@arndb.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201205310922.18550.arnd@arndb.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Arnd Bergmann [120531 02:26]: > On Thursday 31 May 2012, ABRAHAM, KISHON VIJAY wrote: > > > > > > Just put the devices you actually want into the device tree instead and > > > have them automatically created. > > > > But shouldn't device tree support and non-device tree support co-exist > > till the non-device tree is completely knocked out of the kernel? Even > > Well, it's a new driver, so there is no regression in supporting it only > on DT-enabled boards. OMAP5 is DT-only anyway and OMAP4 only supports two > boards that should both be working with the generic DT code already. I agree, let's keep the new omap4/5 drivers DT only. Regards, Tony