linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zhao Chenhui <chenhui.zhao@freescale.com>
To: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
Cc: <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<galak@kernel.crashing.org>, <leoli@freescale.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/5] powerpc/85xx: implement hardware timebase sync
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2012 17:08:31 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120605090831.GA21929@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FC8E250.9090000@freescale.com>

On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 10:40:00AM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> On 05/11/2012 06:53 AM, Zhao Chenhui wrote:
> >  #ifdef CONFIG_KEXEC
> > +static struct ccsr_guts __iomem *guts;
> > +static u64 timebase;
> > +static int tb_req;
> > +static int tb_valid;
> > +
> > +static void mpc85xx_timebase_freeze(int freeze)
> 
> Why is this under CONFIG_KEXEC?  It'll also be needed for CPU hotplug.

Yes, the timebase sync is also needed for CPU hotplug, but this patch is unrelated to CPU hotplug.
I added CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU in the next patch.

> 
> > +{
> > +	unsigned int mask;
> > +
> > +	if (!guts)
> > +		return;
> > +
> > +	mask = CCSR_GUTS_DEVDISR_TB0 | CCSR_GUTS_DEVDISR_TB1;
> > +	if (freeze)
> > +		setbits32(&guts->devdisr, mask);
> > +	else
> > +		clrbits32(&guts->devdisr, mask);
> > +
> > +	in_be32(&guts->devdisr);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void mpc85xx_give_timebase(void)
> > +{
> > +	unsigned long flags;
> > +
> > +	local_irq_save(flags);
> > +
> > +	while (!tb_req)
> > +		barrier();
> > +	tb_req = 0;
> > +
> > +	mpc85xx_timebase_freeze(1);
> > +	timebase = get_tb();
> > +	mb();
> > +	tb_valid = 1;
> > +
> > +	while (tb_valid)
> > +		barrier();
> > +
> > +	mpc85xx_timebase_freeze(0);
> > +
> > +	local_irq_restore(flags);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void mpc85xx_take_timebase(void)
> > +{
> > +	unsigned long flags;
> > +
> > +	local_irq_save(flags);
> > +
> > +	tb_req = 1;
> > +	while (!tb_valid)
> > +		barrier();
> > +
> > +	set_tb(timebase >> 32, timebase & 0xffffffff);
> > +	mb();
> > +	tb_valid = 0;
> > +
> > +	local_irq_restore(flags);
> > +}
> 
> I know you say this is for dual-core chips only, but it would be nice if
> you'd write this in a way that doesn't assume that (even if the
> corenet-specific timebase freezing comes later).

At this point, I have not thought about how to implement the cornet-specific timebase freezing.

> 
> Do we need an isync after setting the timebase, to ensure it's happened
> before we enable the timebase?  Likewise, do we need a readback after
> disabling the timebase to ensure it's disabled before we read the
> timebase in give_timebase?

I checked the e500 core manual (Chapter 2.16 Synchronization Requirements for SPRs).
Only some SPR registers need an isync. The timebase registers do not.

I did a readback in mpc85xx_timebase_freeze().

> 
> >  atomic_t kexec_down_cpus = ATOMIC_INIT(0);
> >  
> >  void mpc85xx_smp_kexec_cpu_down(int crash_shutdown, int secondary)
> > @@ -228,6 +286,20 @@ smp_85xx_setup_cpu(int cpu_nr)
> >  		doorbell_setup_this_cpu();
> >  }
> >  
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_KEXEC
> > +static const struct of_device_id guts_ids[] = {
> > +	{ .compatible = "fsl,mpc8572-guts", },
> > +	{ .compatible = "fsl,mpc8560-guts", },
> > +	{ .compatible = "fsl,mpc8536-guts", },
> > +	{ .compatible = "fsl,p1020-guts", },
> > +	{ .compatible = "fsl,p1021-guts", },
> > +	{ .compatible = "fsl,p1022-guts", },
> > +	{ .compatible = "fsl,p1023-guts", },
> > +	{ .compatible = "fsl,p2020-guts", },
> > +	{},
> > +};
> > +#endif
> 
> MPC8560 and MPC8536 are single-core...

Thanks. I will remove them.

> 
> Also please use a more specific name, such as e500v2_smp_guts_ids or
> mpc85xx_smp_guts_ids -- when corenet support is added it will likely be
> in the same file.
> 
> >  void __init mpc85xx_smp_init(void)
> >  {
> >  	struct device_node *np;
> > @@ -249,6 +321,19 @@ void __init mpc85xx_smp_init(void)
> >  		smp_85xx_ops.cause_ipi = doorbell_cause_ipi;
> >  	}
> >  
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_KEXEC
> > +	np = of_find_matching_node(NULL, guts_ids);
> > +	if (np) {
> > +		guts = of_iomap(np, 0);
> > +		smp_85xx_ops.give_timebase = mpc85xx_give_timebase;
> > +		smp_85xx_ops.take_timebase = mpc85xx_take_timebase;
> > +		of_node_put(np);
> > +	} else {
> > +		smp_85xx_ops.give_timebase = smp_generic_give_timebase;
> > +		smp_85xx_ops.take_timebase = smp_generic_take_timebase;
> > +	}
> 
> Do not use smp_generic_give/take_timebase, ever.  If you don't have the
> guts node, then just assume the timebase is already synced.
> 
> -Scott

smp_generic_give/take_timebase is the default in KEXEC before.
If do not set them, it may make KEXEC fail on other platforms.

-Chenhui



  reply	other threads:[~2012-06-05  9:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-05-11 11:53 [PATCH v5 1/5] powerpc/85xx: implement hardware timebase sync Zhao Chenhui
2012-05-11 11:53 ` [PATCH v5 2/5] powerpc/85xx: add HOTPLUG_CPU support Zhao Chenhui
2012-06-01 21:27   ` Scott Wood
2012-06-04 11:04     ` Zhao Chenhui
2012-06-04 16:32       ` Scott Wood
2012-06-05 11:18         ` Zhao Chenhui
2012-06-05 16:15           ` Scott Wood
2012-06-06  9:59             ` Zhao Chenhui
2012-06-06 18:19               ` Scott Wood
2012-05-11 11:53 ` [PATCH v5 3/5] powerpc/85xx: add sleep and deep sleep support Zhao Chenhui
2012-06-01 21:54   ` Scott Wood
2012-06-04 11:12     ` Zhao Chenhui
2012-06-04 22:58       ` Scott Wood
2012-06-05 11:35         ` Zhao Chenhui
2012-06-05 16:13           ` Scott Wood
2012-05-11 11:53 ` [PATCH v5 4/5] fsl_pmc: Add API to enable device as wakeup event source Zhao Chenhui
2012-06-01 22:08   ` Scott Wood
2012-06-04 11:36     ` Zhao Chenhui
2012-06-04 23:02       ` Scott Wood
2012-06-05  4:08         ` Li Yang-R58472
2012-06-05 16:11           ` Scott Wood
2012-06-05 16:49             ` Li Yang-R58472
2012-06-05 18:05               ` Scott Wood
2012-06-06  4:06                 ` Li Yang
2012-06-06 18:29                   ` Scott Wood
2012-06-07  4:10                     ` Li Yang
2012-05-11 11:53 ` [PATCH v5 5/5] powerpc/85xx: add support to JOG feature using cpufreq interface Zhao Chenhui
2012-06-01 23:30   ` Scott Wood
2012-06-05 10:59     ` Zhao Chenhui
2012-06-05 15:58       ` Scott Wood
2012-06-06 10:19         ` Zhao Chenhui
2012-05-29  7:30 ` [PATCH v5 1/5] powerpc/85xx: implement hardware timebase sync Li Yang
2012-06-01 15:40 ` Scott Wood
2012-06-05  9:08   ` Zhao Chenhui [this message]
2012-06-05 16:07     ` Scott Wood
2012-06-06  9:31       ` Zhao Chenhui
2012-06-06 18:26         ` Scott Wood
2012-06-07  4:07           ` Zhao Chenhui

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120605090831.GA21929@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=chenhui.zhao@freescale.com \
    --cc=galak@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=leoli@freescale.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=scottwood@freescale.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).