linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
To: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [MMTests] Sysbench read-only on ext3
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2012 09:19:03 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120724081903.GL9222@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1343096969.7412.21.camel@marge.simpson.net>

On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 04:29:29AM +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-07-23 at 22:13 +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> 
> > The backing database was postgres.
> 
> FWIW, that wouldn't have been my choice.  I don't know if it still does,
> but it used to use userland spinlocks to achieve scalability. 

The tests used to support mysql but the code bit-rotted and eventually
got deleted. I'm not going to get into a mysql vs postgres discussion on
which is better :O

Were you thinking of mysql or something else as an alternative?
Completely different test?

> Turning
> your CPUs into space heaters to combat concurrency issues makes a pretty
> flat graph, but probably doesn't test kernels as well as something that
> did not do that.
> 

I did not check the source, but even if it is true then your comments only
applies to testing scalability of locking. If someone really cares to check,
the postgres version was 9.0.4. However, even if they are using user-space
locking, the test is still useful for looking at the IO performance,
page reclaim decisions and so on.

-- 
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs

  reply	other threads:[~2012-07-24  8:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-06-20 11:32 MMTests 0.04 Mel Gorman
2012-06-29 11:19 ` Mel Gorman
2012-06-29 11:21   ` [MMTests] Page allocator Mel Gorman
2012-06-29 11:22   ` [MMTests] Network performance Mel Gorman
2012-06-29 11:23   ` [MMTests] IO metadata on ext3 Mel Gorman
2012-06-29 11:24   ` [MMTests] IO metadata on ext4 Mel Gorman
2012-06-29 11:25   ` [MMTests] IO metadata on XFS Mel Gorman
2012-07-01 23:54     ` Dave Chinner
2012-07-02  6:32       ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-07-02 14:32         ` Mel Gorman
2012-07-02 19:35           ` Mel Gorman
2012-07-03  0:19             ` Dave Chinner
2012-07-03 10:59               ` Mel Gorman
2012-07-03 11:44                 ` Mel Gorman
2012-07-03 12:31                 ` Daniel Vetter
2012-07-03 13:08                   ` Mel Gorman
2012-07-04  0:47                 ` Dave Chinner
2012-07-04  9:51                   ` Mel Gorman
2012-07-03 13:04             ` Mel Gorman
2012-07-03 14:04               ` Daniel Vetter
2012-07-02 13:30       ` Mel Gorman
2012-07-04 15:52   ` [MMTests] Page reclaim performance on ext3 Mel Gorman
2012-07-04 15:53   ` [MMTests] Page reclaim performance on ext4 Mel Gorman
2012-07-04 15:53   ` [MMTests] Page reclaim performance on xfs Mel Gorman
2012-07-05 14:56   ` [MMTests] Interactivity during IO on ext3 Mel Gorman
2012-07-10  9:49     ` Jan Kara
2012-07-10 11:30       ` Mel Gorman
2012-07-05 14:57   ` [MMTests] Interactivity during IO on ext4 Mel Gorman
2012-07-23 21:12   ` [MMTests] Scheduler Mel Gorman
2012-07-23 21:13   ` [MMTests] Sysbench read-only on ext3 Mel Gorman
2012-07-24  2:29     ` Mike Galbraith
2012-07-24  8:19       ` Mel Gorman [this message]
2012-07-24  8:32         ` Mike Galbraith
2012-07-23 21:14   ` [MMTests] Sysbench read-only on ext4 Mel Gorman
2012-07-23 21:15   ` [MMTests] Sysbench read-only on xfs Mel Gorman
2012-07-23 21:17   ` [MMTests] memcachetest and parallel IO on ext3 Mel Gorman
2012-07-23 21:19   ` [MMTests] memcachetest and parallel IO on xfs Mel Gorman
2012-07-23 21:20   ` [MMTests] Stress high-order allocations on ext3 Mel Gorman
2012-07-23 21:21   ` [MMTests] dbench4 async " Mel Gorman
2012-08-16 14:52     ` Jan Kara
2012-08-21 22:00     ` Jan Kara
2012-08-22 10:48       ` Mel Gorman
2012-07-23 21:23   ` [MMTests] dbench4 async on ext4 Mel Gorman
2012-07-23 21:24   ` [MMTests] Threaded IO Performance on ext3 Mel Gorman
2012-07-23 21:25   ` [MMTests] Threaded IO Performance on xfs Mel Gorman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120724081903.GL9222@suse.de \
    --to=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=efault@gmx.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).