linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: "Linux-sh list" <linux-sh@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Linux PM list <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4/4] PM / shmobile: Specify device latencies for Mackerel devices directly
Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2012 00:29:16 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201208080029.16394.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201208080026.01738.rjw@sisk.pl>


The results of adaptive latency computations in
GENPD_DEV_TIMED_CALLBACK() show that the start/stop and save/restore
state latencies of all devices on the Mackerel board I have tried are
a little below 250 us.  Therefore, if the 250 us is used as the
common initial value of the latency fields in struct gpd_timing_data
for all devices on Mackerel, the latency values will never have to
change at run time and there won't be any overhead related to
re-computation of the corresponding PM QoS data.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
---
 arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-mackerel.c |   31 +++++++++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

Index: linux/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-mackerel.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-mackerel.c
+++ linux/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-mackerel.c
@@ -1407,8 +1407,15 @@ static struct i2c_board_info i2c1_device
 #define GPIO_PORT168CR	0xE60520A8
 #define SRCR4		0xe61580bc
 #define USCCR1		0xE6058144
+#define DEV_LATENCY_NS	250000
 static void __init mackerel_init(void)
 {
+	struct gpd_timing_data latencies = {
+		.stop_latency_ns = DEV_LATENCY_NS,
+		.start_latency_ns = DEV_LATENCY_NS,
+		.save_state_latency_ns = DEV_LATENCY_NS,
+		.restore_state_latency_ns = DEV_LATENCY_NS,
+	};
 	u32 srcr4;
 	struct clk *clk;
 
@@ -1623,20 +1630,20 @@ static void __init mackerel_init(void)
 
 	platform_add_devices(mackerel_devices, ARRAY_SIZE(mackerel_devices));
 
-	rmobile_add_device_to_domain("A4LC", &lcdc_device);
-	rmobile_add_device_to_domain("A4LC", &hdmi_lcdc_device);
-	rmobile_add_device_to_domain("A4LC", &meram_device);
-	rmobile_add_device_to_domain("A4MP", &fsi_device);
-	rmobile_add_device_to_domain("A3SP", &usbhs0_device);
-	rmobile_add_device_to_domain("A3SP", &usbhs1_device);
-	rmobile_add_device_to_domain("A3SP", &nand_flash_device);
-	rmobile_add_device_to_domain("A3SP", &sh_mmcif_device);
-	rmobile_add_device_to_domain("A3SP", &sdhi0_device);
+	rmobile_add_device_to_domain_td("A4LC", &lcdc_device, &latencies);
+	rmobile_add_device_to_domain_td("A4LC", &hdmi_lcdc_device, &latencies);
+	rmobile_add_device_to_domain_td("A4LC", &meram_device, &latencies);
+	rmobile_add_device_to_domain_td("A4MP", &fsi_device, &latencies);
+	rmobile_add_device_to_domain_td("A3SP", &usbhs0_device, &latencies);
+	rmobile_add_device_to_domain_td("A3SP", &usbhs1_device, &latencies);
+	rmobile_add_device_to_domain_td("A3SP", &nand_flash_device, &latencies);
+	rmobile_add_device_to_domain_td("A3SP", &sh_mmcif_device, &latencies);
+	rmobile_add_device_to_domain_td("A3SP", &sdhi0_device, &latencies);
 #if !defined(CONFIG_MMC_SH_MMCIF) && !defined(CONFIG_MMC_SH_MMCIF_MODULE)
-	rmobile_add_device_to_domain("A3SP", &sdhi1_device);
+	rmobile_add_device_to_domain_td("A3SP", &sdhi1_device, &latencies);
 #endif
-	rmobile_add_device_to_domain("A3SP", &sdhi2_device);
-	rmobile_add_device_to_domain("A4R", &ceu_device);
+	rmobile_add_device_to_domain_td("A3SP", &sdhi2_device, &latencies);
+	rmobile_add_device_to_domain_td("A4R", &ceu_device, &latencies);
 
 	hdmi_init_pm_clock();
 	sh7372_pm_init();


      parent reply	other threads:[~2012-08-08  9:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-07-21 21:49 [RFC][PATCH 0/5] PM / shmobile: Specify PM domain and device latency information directly Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-07-21 21:53 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/5] PM / shmobile: Set SH7372 PM domain on/off latencies directly Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-07-21 21:54 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/5] PM / shmobile: Allow device latencies to be specified directly Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-07-21 21:54 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/5] PM / shmobile: Specify device latencies for SH7372 devices directly Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-07-21 21:55 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/5] PM / shmobile: Specify device latencies for Mackerel " Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-07-21 21:56 ` [RFC][PATCH 5/5] PM / shmobile: Allow device latencies to be read from a DT Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-08-07 22:26 ` [PATCH 0/4] PM / shmobile: Specify PM domain and device latency information directly Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-08-07 22:27   ` [PATCH 1/4] PM / shmobile: Set PM domain on/off latencies directly Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-08-07 22:27   ` [PATCH 2/4] PM / shmobile: Allow device latencies to be specified directly Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-08-07 22:28   ` [PATCH 3/4] PM / shmobile: Specify device latencies for SH7372 devices directly Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-08-07 22:29   ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201208080029.16394.rjw@sisk.pl \
    --to=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=magnus.damm@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).