From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759328Ab2HITKk (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Aug 2012 15:10:40 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:27224 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759222Ab2HITJ0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Aug 2012 15:09:26 -0400 Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2012 15:50:47 -0300 From: Marcelo Tosatti To: Xiao Guangrong Cc: Avi Kivity , LKML , KVM Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 03/12] KVM: introduce gfn_to_pfn_memslot_atomic Message-ID: <20120809185047.GB20889@amt.cnet> References: <5020E423.9080004@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <5020E4B0.9090609@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5020E4B0.9090609@linux.vnet.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Aug 07, 2012 at 05:49:36PM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote: > It can instead of hva_to_pfn_atomic > > Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong > --- > arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c | 5 +---- > include/linux/kvm_host.h | 3 ++- > virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 14 ++++++++------ > 3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) What if someone needs gfn_to_hva_memslot in the future, which is not unlikely?