linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
To: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 05/12] KVM: reorganize hva_to_pfn
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 14:51:16 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120810175115.GA12477@amt.cnet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5020E509.8070901@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

On Tue, Aug 07, 2012 at 05:51:05PM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
> We do too many things in hva_to_pfn, this patch reorganize the code,
> let it be better readable
> 
> Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
>  virt/kvm/kvm_main.c |  159 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
>  1 files changed, 97 insertions(+), 62 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> index 26ffc87..dd01bcb 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> @@ -1043,83 +1043,118 @@ static inline int check_user_page_hwpoison(unsigned long addr)
>  	return rc == -EHWPOISON;
>  }
> 
> -static pfn_t hva_to_pfn(unsigned long addr, bool atomic, bool *async,
> -			bool write_fault, bool *writable)
> +/*
> + * The atomic path to get the writable pfn which will be stored in @pfn,
> + * true indicates success, otherwise false is returned.
> + */
> +static bool hva_to_pfn_fast(unsigned long addr, bool atomic, bool *async,
> +			    bool write_fault, bool *writable, pfn_t *pfn)
>  {
>  	struct page *page[1];
> -	int npages = 0;
> -	pfn_t pfn;
> +	int npages;
> 
> -	/* we can do it either atomically or asynchronously, not both */
> -	BUG_ON(atomic && async);
> +	if (!(async || atomic))
> +		return false;
> 
> -	BUG_ON(!write_fault && !writable);
> +	npages = __get_user_pages_fast(addr, 1, 1, page);
> +	if (npages == 1) {
> +		*pfn = page_to_pfn(page[0]);
> 
> -	if (writable)
> -		*writable = true;
> +		if (writable)
> +			*writable = true;
> +		return true;
> +	}
> +
> +	return false;
> +}
> 
> -	if (atomic || async)
> -		npages = __get_user_pages_fast(addr, 1, 1, page);
> +/*
> + * The slow path to get the pfn of the specified host virtual address,
> + * 1 indicates success, -errno is returned if error is detected.
> + */
> +static int hva_to_pfn_slow(unsigned long addr, bool *async, bool write_fault,
> +			   bool *writable, pfn_t *pfn)
> +{
> +	struct page *page[1];
> +	int npages = 0;
> 
> -	if (unlikely(npages != 1) && !atomic) {
> -		might_sleep();
> +	might_sleep();
> 
> -		if (writable)
> -			*writable = write_fault;
> -
> -		if (async) {
> -			down_read(&current->mm->mmap_sem);
> -			npages = get_user_page_nowait(current, current->mm,
> -						     addr, write_fault, page);
> -			up_read(&current->mm->mmap_sem);
> -		} else
> -			npages = get_user_pages_fast(addr, 1, write_fault,
> -						     page);
> -
> -		/* map read fault as writable if possible */
> -		if (unlikely(!write_fault) && npages == 1) {
> -			struct page *wpage[1];
> -
> -			npages = __get_user_pages_fast(addr, 1, 1, wpage);
> -			if (npages == 1) {
> -				*writable = true;
> -				put_page(page[0]);
> -				page[0] = wpage[0];
> -			}
> -			npages = 1;
> +	if (writable)
> +		*writable = write_fault;
> +
> +	if (async) {
> +		down_read(&current->mm->mmap_sem);
> +		npages = get_user_page_nowait(current, current->mm,
> +					      addr, write_fault, page);
> +		up_read(&current->mm->mmap_sem);
> +	} else
> +		npages = get_user_pages_fast(addr, 1, write_fault,
> +					     page);
> +	if (npages != 1)
> +		return npages;

 * Returns number of pages pinned. This may be fewer than the number
 * requested. If nr_pages is 0 or negative, returns 0. If no pages
 * were pinned, returns -errno.
 */
int get_user_pages_fast(unsigned long start, int nr_pages, int write,
                        struct page **pages)


Current behaviour is

        if (atomic || async)
                npages = __get_user_pages_fast(addr, 1, 1, page);

	if (npages != 1) 
		slow path retry;

The changes above change this, don't they?


  reply	other threads:[~2012-08-10 18:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-08-07  9:47 [PATCH v5 00/12] KVM: introduce readonly memslot Xiao Guangrong
2012-08-07  9:48 ` [PATCH v5 01/12] KVM: fix missing check for memslot flags Xiao Guangrong
2012-08-07  9:48 ` [PATCH v5 02/12] KVM: hide KVM_MEMSLOT_INVALID from userspace Xiao Guangrong
2012-08-09 18:48   ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-08-10  2:11     ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-08-07  9:49 ` [PATCH v5 03/12] KVM: introduce gfn_to_pfn_memslot_atomic Xiao Guangrong
2012-08-09 18:50   ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-08-10  3:22     ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-08-07  9:50 ` [PATCH v5 04/12] KVM: introduce gfn_to_hva_read/kvm_read_hva/kvm_read_hva_atomic Xiao Guangrong
2012-08-07  9:51 ` [PATCH v5 05/12] KVM: reorganize hva_to_pfn Xiao Guangrong
2012-08-10 17:51   ` Marcelo Tosatti [this message]
2012-08-11  3:11     ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-08-07  9:51 ` [PATCH v5 06/12] KVM: use 'writable' as a hint to map writable pfn Xiao Guangrong
2012-08-07  9:52 ` [PATCH v5 07/12] KVM: introduce KVM_PFN_ERR_RO_FAULT Xiao Guangrong
2012-08-07  9:52 ` [PATCH v5 08/12] KVM: introduce KVM_HVA_ERR_BAD Xiao Guangrong
2012-08-07  9:53 ` [PATCH v5 09/12] KVM: introduce KVM_HVA_ERR_RO_BAD Xiao Guangrong
2012-08-07  9:54 ` [PATCH v5 10/12] KVM: introduce readonly memslot Xiao Guangrong
2012-08-07  9:54 ` [PATCH v5 11/12] KVM: x86: introduce set_mmio_exit_info Xiao Guangrong
2012-08-10 18:03   ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-08-11  3:13     ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-08-07  9:55 ` [PATCH v5 12/12] KVM: indicate readonly access fault Xiao Guangrong
2012-08-10 18:14 ` [PATCH v5 00/12] KVM: introduce readonly memslot Marcelo Tosatti
2012-08-11  3:36   ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-08-13 17:39     ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-08-14  2:58       ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-08-14 15:25         ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-08-16  5:49           ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-08-16 16:03             ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-08-14 14:00   ` Avi Kivity
2012-08-14 15:51     ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-08-15 10:44       ` Avi Kivity
2012-08-15 17:53         ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-08-16  9:03           ` Avi Kivity
2012-08-16 15:57             ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-08-16 16:17               ` Avi Kivity

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120810175115.GA12477@amt.cnet \
    --to=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).