From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755151Ab2HOOHF (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Aug 2012 10:07:05 -0400 Received: from mail-qc0-f174.google.com ([209.85.216.174]:54074 "EHLO mail-qc0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754306Ab2HOOHB (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Aug 2012 10:07:01 -0400 Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 07:06:55 -0700 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, Borislav Petkov , Peter Zijlstra , "H. Peter Anvin" Subject: Re: [ 36/44] x86, microcode: Sanitize per-cpu microcode reloading interface Message-ID: <20120815140655.GC22871@kroah.com> References: <20120813220142.113186818@linuxfoundation.org> <20120813220145.337264645@linuxfoundation.org> <20120815002654.GA11666@khazad-dum.debian.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120815002654.GA11666@khazad-dum.debian.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 09:26:54PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > I believe the patch bellow, which was required on 3.2, will also be > necessary. Will it be necessary to apply this before this patch goes in the series, or after it? thanks, greg k-h