From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030859Ab2HQHtY (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Aug 2012 03:49:24 -0400 Received: from mga14.intel.com ([143.182.124.37]:29209 "EHLO mga14.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932119Ab2HQHtW (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Aug 2012 03:49:22 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.77,783,1336374000"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="135292527" Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 10:49:01 +0300 From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" To: Andrea Arcangeli Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-mm@kvack.org, Andi Kleen , "H. Peter Anvin" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Kirill A. Shutemov" Subject: Re: [PATCH, RFC 6/9] thp: add address parameter to split_huge_page_pmd() Message-ID: <20120817074901.GA9833@otc-wbsnb-06> References: <1344503300-9507-1-git-send-email-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> <1344503300-9507-7-git-send-email-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> <20120816194201.GQ11188@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="W/nzBZO5zC0uMSeA" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120816194201.GQ11188@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --W/nzBZO5zC0uMSeA Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 09:42:01PM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > On Thu, Aug 09, 2012 at 12:08:17PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: > > From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" > >=20 > > It's required to implement huge zero pmd splitting. > >=20 >=20 > This isn't bisectable with the next one, it'd fail on wfg 0-DAY kernel > build testing backend, however this is clearly to separate this patch > from the next, to keep the size small so I don't mind. Hm. I don't see why it's not bisectable. It's only add a new parameter to the function. The parameter is unused until next patch. Actually, I've checked build bisectability with aiaiai[1]. [1] http://git.infradead.org/users/dedekind/aiaiai.git --=20 Kirill A. Shutemov --W/nzBZO5zC0uMSeA Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJQLfdtAAoJEAd+omnVudOM3rMQAIcawtMYkfooQfvwZvr6w3JW oC0ege7lexwLyYvaEdPGMurV9cnUn8wsf66TlN8It43mdPGbCy3cQ0qMtFy2nBcn BlD6vbDto7Gn6PUZmQhjQjHpYwiQhbFESeMJ23e9JlCy9M1i842VpePj4aXNpO3t oF0basphC/R7+2dx3Ffi4JL3lP3B/cEapw+Mt3F1HJQc2aLN83AWnSiTvwMBkwzR YWBDZzMrb5R0+fvdxgVH/B5gi97tWjT2mXTcmRKekKeP/lbrENYAo4ZXhSwIbQlc FTil+YzgV3GG1lTb0wYbmTq4NYsJYt2DkSGWvDJVvRuZ6sEBwO3RC65IU+wmvTw9 L3PVxDNVEnGFrRRk2ePq8mlWEuxV1vvQFV8w1uOmWiZP5ef8eYSZXrXRNiRADbA9 +hk3IerQDdVG1Rk0gnjqlOLDVTxq4TYc3gfvKpYhrmoPd5qj/ELeE9fG/Vy/Lg3a U1hCce8jK6hCFiTkEYsKvG3XRd6AvYYh1AtrOmOYgn6Wi9yE1TB8rTsDBClM/GEW t0dsJPI8T4snylWGsWx+rMBZUYdHeyKyuNHHuVfMXRzg88UzkjCl/aeBFYeOiAtE d88viONyShLty6X2Nlri0B6VQvQ3sb77o/UyPt279hGNTP102TNegF99OP+n6Unl XLmVJXnf8pyqt2eGflzK =HQXK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --W/nzBZO5zC0uMSeA--