From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758683Ab2HUVtG (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Aug 2012 17:49:06 -0400 Received: from mail-pb0-f46.google.com ([209.85.160.46]:40246 "EHLO mail-pb0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758482Ab2HUVtA (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Aug 2012 17:49:00 -0400 Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 14:48:56 -0700 From: Tejun Heo To: Lennart Poettering Cc: aris@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, Li Zefan , Hugh Dickins , Hillf Danton Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/4] cgroup: add xattr support Message-ID: <20120821214856.GC32596@google.com> References: <20120816174453.154143248@napanee.usersys.redhat.com> <20120816174454.087507415@napanee.usersys.redhat.com> <20120816200006.GG24861@google.com> <50340110.50607@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <50340110.50607@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello, On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 11:43:44PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > >I'm not against this but unsure whether using kmem is enough for the > >suggested use case. Lennart, would this suit systemd? How much > >metadata are we talking about? > > Just small things, like values, PIDs, i.e. a few 100 bytes or so per > cgroup should be more than sufficient for our needs. Alright, then. I think there's gonna be one more round to address Hugh's comments. Hugh, how should this be routed? Is there some git branch that tmpfs changes can go in so that cgroup tree can pull? Thanks. -- tejun