From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933300Ab2HWJ35 (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Aug 2012 05:29:57 -0400 Received: from mail-lb0-f174.google.com ([209.85.217.174]:39847 "EHLO mail-lb0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932365Ab2HWJ3w (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Aug 2012 05:29:52 -0400 Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 13:29:47 +0400 From: Cyrill Gorcunov To: Marco Stornelli Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" , Pavel Emelyanov , "J. Bruce Fields" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" , Al Viro , Alexey Dobriyan , Andrew Morton , James Bottomley , Matthew Helsley Subject: Re: [patch 4/8] fs, exportfs: Add export_encode_inode_fh helper Message-ID: <20120823092947.GC1992@moon> References: <20120820163338.GN23596@moon> <20120820183225.GB4911@fieldses.org> <20120820190606.GE27443@moon> <20120820193204.GD5779@fieldses.org> <50335261.5090504@parallels.com> <87wr0sle4v.fsf@skywalker.in.ibm.com> <503367CB.9080609@parallels.com> <87zk5nsch8.fsf@skywalker.in.ibm.com> <20120823080627.GA1992@moon> <5035EFD4.7090404@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5035EFD4.7090404@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 10:54:44AM +0200, Marco Stornelli wrote: > >>For brtfs > >> > >> objectid = fid->objectid; > >> root_objectid = fid->root_objectid; > >> generation = fid->gen; > >> > >> return btrfs_get_dentry(sb, objectid, root_objectid, generation, 1); > > > >For btrfs it become more complex. But still the last version I'm about > >to send for review today (once everything get tested) will provide > >fhandle carried with inotify mark _and_ inode number and device. This > >information should be enough for us. After all having inode and device > >should allow us to figure out the fs used on inotify target. > > Sorry if it's a really stupid question but I didn't follow deeply > the thread. How can you provide a device if the fs is mounted on > "none" (ex tmpfs)? In this case you can't associate device <=> fs, > because you haven't got a /dev/something. That's ::s_dev from superblock, together with parsing /proc/$pid/mountinfo and /proc/mounts you can figure out anything you need. Cyrill