From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934069Ab2HWPZv (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Aug 2012 11:25:51 -0400 Received: from fieldses.org ([174.143.236.118]:57164 "EHLO fieldses.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932199Ab2HWPZr (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Aug 2012 11:25:47 -0400 Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 11:25:45 -0400 From: "J. Bruce Fields" To: Cyrill Gorcunov Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Al Viro , Alexey Dobriyan , Andrew Morton , Pavel Emelyanov , James Bottomley , Matthew Helsley , aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com Subject: Re: [patch 0/9] extended fdinfo via procfs series, v7 Message-ID: <20120823152545.GC6923@fieldses.org> References: <20120823104323.040550004@openvz.org> <20120823122318.GD29943@fieldses.org> <20120823124427.GD1992@moon> <20120823135234.GE29943@fieldses.org> <20120823135606.GE1992@moon> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120823135606.GE1992@moon> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 05:56:06PM +0400, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote: > On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 09:52:34AM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > > > > I don't have any opinion on whether there should be a configuration > > option. Just want to make sure the cost when it's turned on is still > > taken seriously. > > I see. So, does the rest of series looks fine for you (except this config > moment)? You're using the common filehandle code instead of encoding your own from scratch, which was my only serious objection. I haven't reviewed the rest of it carefully. --b.