From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759879Ab2HXQVC (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Aug 2012 12:21:02 -0400 Received: from mail1-hoer.fullrate.dk ([89.150.129.84]:51877 "EHLO smtp.fullrate.dk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759498Ab2HXQVA (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Aug 2012 12:21:00 -0400 From: Martin Nybo Andersen To: wbrana Subject: Re: Drop support for x86-32 Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 18:20:54 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.6.0-rc2+; KDE/4.8.4; i686; ; ) Cc: Bernd Petrovitsch , Ondrej Zary , "linux-kernel" References: <201208241814.16862.tweek@tweek.dk> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201208241820.54778.tweek@tweek.dk> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Friday 24 August 2012 18:17:14 wbrana wrote: > On 8/24/12, Martin Nybo Andersen wrote: > > Ahh..., so the development time saved by not supporting x86-32 in > > mainline can > > now be used by backporting new features to the forementioned long term > > tree? > > new features won't be backported Ok. Seriously. Dropping one of the most used architectures for no apparent reason makes no sense at all. -- Cheers, Martin