From: Borislav Petkov <bp@amd64.org>
To: "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@amd64.org>,
tony.luck@intel.com, andi@firstfloor.org,
gong.chen@linux.intel.com, ananth@in.ibm.com,
masbock@linux.vnet.ibm.com, x86@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lcm@us.ibm.com, mingo@redhat.com,
tglx@linutronix.de, linux-edac@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86/mce: Pack boolean MCE boot flags into a structure
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 22:18:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120827201840.GC9539@aftab.osrc.amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <503BAB00.1080708@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 10:44:40PM +0530, Naveen N. Rao wrote:
> Looks good. Infact, I had actually added mce_ser and mce_disabled
> into the bitfield, but backed off not wanting to overdo.
>
> We could pull in all the other configuration parameters into this
> structure as long as everyone is ok with this.
Well, if you'd like, you can make one change per patch so that they can
be easily reviewable.
> >diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/mce.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/mce.h
> >index a3ac52b29cbf..e5cfd241e508 100644
> >--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/mce.h
> >+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/mce.h
> >@@ -126,7 +126,6 @@ struct mce_log {
> > #define K8_MCE_THRESHOLD_BANK_5 (MCE_THRESHOLD_BASE + 5 * 9)
> > #define K8_MCE_THRESHOLD_DRAM_ECC (MCE_THRESHOLD_BANK_4 + 0)
> >
> >-
> > #ifdef __KERNEL__
> >
> > extern void mce_register_decode_chain(struct notifier_block *nb);
> >@@ -169,8 +168,6 @@ DECLARE_PER_CPU(struct device *, mce_device);
> > #define MAX_NR_BANKS 32
> >
> > #ifdef CONFIG_X86_MCE_INTEL
> >-extern int mce_cmci_disabled;
> >-extern int mce_ignore_ce;
> > void mce_intel_feature_init(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c);
> > void cmci_clear(void);
> > void cmci_reenable(void);
> >diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce-internal.h b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce-internal.h
> >index 6a05c1d327a9..3b25bcf452d9 100644
> >--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce-internal.h
> >+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce-internal.h
> >@@ -28,6 +28,15 @@ extern int mce_ser;
> >
> > extern struct mce_bank *mce_banks;
> >
> >+struct mce_cfg {
> >+ __u32 cmci_disabled : 1,
> >+ ignore_ce : 1,
> >+ dont_log_ce : 1,
> >+ __pad : 29;
> >+};
> >+
> >+extern struct mce_cfg cfg;
> >+
>
> I'd prefer mce_cfg, rather than just cfg. I think it looks clearer
> to say, for instance, mce_ser.ignore_ce rather than just
> cfg.ignore_ce where the latter looks more like a global thing. But,
> of course, the former is more concise...
Yes,
* it is more consise
* it is private to mce so no ambiguity
* having identical struct name and variable names is very confusing (at least
to me)
so you can do
extern struct mce_cfg m_cfg;
or
extern struct mce_config mcfg;
or similar but please keep struct name and variable name different.
Thanks.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Advanced Micro Devices GmbH
Einsteinring 24, 85609 Dornach
GM: Alberto Bozzo
Reg: Dornach, Landkreis Muenchen
HRB Nr. 43632 WEEE Registernr: 129 19551
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-27 20:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-27 11:25 [PATCH 1/2] x86/mce: Pack boolean MCE boot flags into a structure Naveen N. Rao
2012-08-27 11:25 ` [PATCH 2/2] x86/mce: Honour bios-set CMCI threshold Naveen N. Rao
2012-08-27 14:48 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-08-27 15:11 ` Naveen N. Rao
2012-08-27 15:21 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-08-27 13:58 ` [PATCH 1/2] x86/mce: Pack boolean MCE boot flags into a structure Andi Kleen
2012-08-27 14:18 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-08-28 6:55 ` Naveen N. Rao
2012-08-27 14:36 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-08-27 15:35 ` Naveen N. Rao
2012-08-27 15:47 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-08-27 16:01 ` Naveen N. Rao
2012-08-27 16:34 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-08-27 17:14 ` Naveen N. Rao
2012-08-27 20:18 ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2012-08-28 7:17 ` Naveen N. Rao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120827201840.GC9539@aftab.osrc.amd.com \
--to=bp@amd64.org \
--cc=ananth@in.ibm.com \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=gong.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=lcm@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-edac@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=masbock@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).