linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
To: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Rob Landley <rob@landley.net>, Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Ludwig Nussel <ludwig.nussel@suse.de>,
	Alessandro Rubini <rubini@gnudd.com>,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Hardening debugfs (Was Re: [PATCH] debugfs: more tightly restrict default mount mode)
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 11:02:15 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120828150215.GB23035@thunk.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1346165758.15747.7.camel@deadeye.wl.decadent.org.uk>

On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 07:55:58AM -0700, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> 
> The problems are apparently larger than specific modules:
> http://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/ksummit-2012-discuss/2012-July/000894.html
> 

Sure, but most of those problems require root access, or physical
access to the hardware.  And a number of the "can oops the kernel"
assume module disappears out from under the open file descriptor, so
(a) that's a problem that can be fixed, and (b) if we can suppress a
random device driver from having its debugfs directory appear by
default, it certainly helps things.

					- Ted

  reply	other threads:[~2012-08-28 15:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-08-27 20:32 [PATCH] debugfs: more tightly restrict default mount mode Kees Cook
2012-08-27 20:41 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2012-08-28  7:44 ` Alessandro Rubini
2012-08-28 14:41 ` Hardening debugfs (Was Re: [PATCH] debugfs: more tightly restrict default mount mode) Theodore Ts'o
2012-08-28 14:55   ` Ben Hutchings
2012-08-28 15:02     ` Theodore Ts'o [this message]
2012-08-28 17:09   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2012-08-28 19:43     ` Kees Cook
2012-08-28 22:55   ` Rob Landley
2012-08-29  4:09     ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2012-08-30 16:15       ` Rob Landley

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120828150215.GB23035@thunk.org \
    --to=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=ben@decadent.org.uk \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ludwig.nussel@suse.de \
    --cc=rob@landley.net \
    --cc=rubini@gnudd.com \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).