Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] virtio-ring: Allocate indirect buffers from cache when possible

["Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>]

On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 03:35:00PM +0200, Sasha Levin wrote:
> On 08/28/2012 03:20 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 03:04:03PM +0200, Sasha Levin wrote:
> >> Currently if VIRTIO_RING_F_INDIRECT_DESC is enabled we will
> >> use indirect descriptors and allocate them using a simple
> >> kmalloc().
> >>
> >> This patch adds a cache which will allow indirect buffers under
> >> a configurable size to be allocated from that cache instead.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@gmail.com>
> > 
> > I imagine this helps performance? Any numbers?
> 
> I ran benchmarks on the original RFC, I've re-tested it now and got similar
> numbers to the original ones (virtio-net using vhost-net, thresh=16):
> 
> Before:
> 	Recv   Send    Send
> 	Socket Socket  Message  Elapsed
> 	Size   Size    Size     Time     Throughput
> 	bytes  bytes   bytes    secs.    10^6bits/sec
> 
> 	 87380  16384  16384    10.00    4512.12
> 
> After:
> 	Recv   Send    Send
> 	Socket Socket  Message  Elapsed
> 	Size   Size    Size     Time     Throughput
> 	bytes  bytes   bytes    secs.    10^6bits/sec
> 
> 	 87380  16384  16384    10.00    5399.18
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> Sasha

This is with both patches 1 + 2?
Sorry could you please also test what happens if you apply
- just patch 1
- just patch 2

Thanks!