From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752229Ab2HaL1D (ORCPT ); Fri, 31 Aug 2012 07:27:03 -0400 Received: from mail-ob0-f174.google.com ([209.85.214.174]:45554 "EHLO mail-ob0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751679Ab2HaL1B (ORCPT ); Fri, 31 Aug 2012 07:27:01 -0400 Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2012 06:26:53 +0800 From: Shawn Guo To: Sascha Hauer Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, HACHIMI Samir , thierry.reding@avionic-design.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, =?iso-8859-1?Q?Beno=EEt_Th=E9baudeau?= , Philipp Zabel Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/9] pwm i.MX: add devicetree support Message-ID: <20120830222650.GD3613@r65073-Latitude-D630> References: <1346154504-5623-1-git-send-email-s.hauer@pengutronix.de> <1346154504-5623-6-git-send-email-s.hauer@pengutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1346154504-5623-6-git-send-email-s.hauer@pengutronix.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 01:48:20PM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote: > From: Philipp Zabel > > Signed-off-by: Philipp Zabel > Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer > --- > drivers/pwm/pwm-imx.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++------ > 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-imx.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-imx.c > index a689144..dfc1bae 100644 > --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-imx.c > +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-imx.c > @@ -16,9 +16,9 @@ > #include > #include > #include > +#include > #include > > - > /* i.MX1 and i.MX21 share the same PWM function block: */ > > #define MX1_PWMC 0x00 /* PWM Control Register */ > @@ -203,8 +203,17 @@ static struct pwm_ops imx_pwm_ops = { > .owner = THIS_MODULE, > }; > > +static const struct of_device_id imx_pwm_dt_ids[] = { > + { .compatible = "fsl,imx1-pwm", .data = &imx_pwm_config_v1, }, > + { .compatible = "fsl,imx27-pwm", .data = &imx_pwm_config_v2, }, > + { /* sentinel */ } > +}; > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, imx_pwm_of_match); s/imx_pwm_of_match/imx_pwm_dt_ids Regards, Shawn > + > static int __devinit imx_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > { > + const struct of_device_id *of_id = > + of_match_device(imx_pwm_dt_ids, &pdev->dev); > struct imx_chip *imx; > struct resource *r; > int ret = 0; > @@ -235,12 +244,16 @@ static int __devinit imx_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > if (imx->mmio_base == NULL) > return -EADDRNOTAVAIL; > > - if (cpu_is_mx1() || cpu_is_mx21()) { > - imx->config = imx_pwm_config_v1; > - imx->set_enable = imx_pwm_set_enable_v1; > + if (of_id) { > + imx->config = of_id->data; > } else { > - imx->config = imx_pwm_config_v2; > - imx->set_enable = imx_pwm_set_enable_v2; > + if (cpu_is_mx1() || cpu_is_mx21()) { > + imx->config = imx_pwm_config_v1; > + imx->set_enable = imx_pwm_set_enable_v1; > + } else { > + imx->config = imx_pwm_config_v2; > + imx->set_enable = imx_pwm_set_enable_v2; > + } > } > > ret = pwmchip_add(&imx->chip); > -- > 1.7.10.4 >