From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753765Ab2HaO05 (ORCPT ); Fri, 31 Aug 2012 10:26:57 -0400 Received: from db3ehsobe005.messaging.microsoft.com ([213.199.154.143]:20265 "EHLO db3outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752075Ab2HaO04 (ORCPT ); Fri, 31 Aug 2012 10:26:56 -0400 X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:70.37.183.190;KIP:(null);UIP:(null);IPV:NLI;H:mail.freescale.net;RD:none;EFVD:NLI X-SpamScore: -2 X-BigFish: VS-2(zz98dI1432Izz1202hzzz2dh87h2a8h668h839h944hd25hd2bhe96hf0ah107ah1220h1151h1155h) X-FB-DOMAIN-IP-MATCH: fail Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2012 09:26:29 +0800 From: Shawn Guo To: Dong Aisheng CC: , , , , , , , , , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/7] mfd: add syscon driver based on regmap Message-ID: <20120831012626.GA7726@r65073-Latitude-D630> References: <1346237818-9498-1-git-send-email-b29396@freescale.com> <1346237818-9498-2-git-send-email-b29396@freescale.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1346237818-9498-2-git-send-email-b29396@freescale.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-OriginatorOrg: sigmatel.com Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 06:56:52PM +0800, Dong Aisheng wrote: > +config MFD_SYSCON > + bool "System Controller Register R/W Based on Regmap" If the driver only compiles and works for device tree probe, we should have the following? depends on OF > + select REGMAP_MMIO > + help > + Select this option to enable accessing system control registers > + via regmap. > + > +struct regmap *syscon_node_to_regmap(struct device_node *np) > +{ > + struct syscon *syscon; > + struct device *dev; > + > + dev = driver_find_device(&syscon_driver.driver, NULL, np, > + syscon_match); > + of_node_put(np); This looks a little unnatural to me. Function syscon_node_to_regmap becomes an API visible to clients, who might never know that np will be put inside the API. I'm saying the client may also call of_node_put to put the node they get. I think of_node_put should be moved out from here and put into syscon_node_to_regmap and syscon_regmap_lookup_by_compatible. Regards, Shawn > + > + if (!dev) > + return ERR_PTR(-EPROBE_DEFER); > + > + syscon = dev_get_drvdata(dev); > + > + return syscon->regmap; > +} > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(syscon_node_to_regmap); > + > +struct regmap *syscon_regmap_lookup_by_compatible(const char *s) > +{ > + struct device_node *syscon_np; > + > + syscon_np = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, s); > + if (!syscon_np) > + return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV); > + > + return syscon_node_to_regmap(syscon_np); > +} > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(syscon_regmap_lookup_by_compatible); > + > +struct regmap *syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle(struct device_node *np, > + const char *property) > +{ > + struct device_node *syscon_np; > + > + syscon_np = of_parse_phandle(np, property, 0); > + if (!syscon_np) > + return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV); > + > + return syscon_node_to_regmap(syscon_np); > +} > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle);