From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755084Ab2HaVej (ORCPT ); Fri, 31 Aug 2012 17:34:39 -0400 Received: from lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk ([81.2.110.251]:40013 "EHLO lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754878Ab2HaVeh (ORCPT ); Fri, 31 Aug 2012 17:34:37 -0400 Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2012 22:39:08 +0100 From: Alan Cox To: Kees Cook Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, James Morris , Eric Paris , Jiri Kosina , John Johansen , Dan Carpenter , Al Viro , linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] security: unconditionally call Yama Message-ID: <20120831223908.4aa5574d@pyramind.ukuu.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <20120831213126.GA19688@www.outflux.net> References: <20120831213126.GA19688@www.outflux.net> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.8; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Face: 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 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 31 Aug 2012 14:31:26 -0700 Kees Cook wrote: > Unconditionally call Yama, no matter what LSM module is selected. > > Ubuntu and Chrome OS already carry patches to do this, and Fedora has > voiced interest in doing this as well. Instead of having everyone carry > these patches, just switch Yama to being unconditional when compiled > into the kernel. Not a good plan. What happens when everyone decides to stack every module by ifdeffing in the kernel - mayhem. I'm all for it being possible but done right - espeicall as I believe a proper proposal now for stacking modules, and it should be done as part of that. Alan