From: Dong Aisheng <b29396@freescale.com>
To: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"linus.walleij@stericsson.com" <linus.walleij@stericsson.com>,
"s.hauer@pengutronix.de" <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
"kernel@pengutronix.de" <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
"grant.likely@secretlab.ca" <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>,
"rob.herring@calxeda.com" <rob.herring@calxeda.com>,
"sameo@linux.intel.com" <sameo@linux.intel.com>,
"lrg@ti.com" <lrg@ti.com>,
"broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com"
<broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
Zhao Richard-B20223 <B20223@freescale.com>,
"devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org"
<devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org>,
"swarren@wwwdotorg.org" <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/7] mfd: add syscon driver based on regmap
Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2012 10:31:03 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120903023102.GA11891@shlinux2.ap.freescale.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120831012626.GA7726@r65073-Latitude-D630>
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 09:26:29AM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 06:56:52PM +0800, Dong Aisheng wrote:
> > +config MFD_SYSCON
> > + bool "System Controller Register R/W Based on Regmap"
>
> If the driver only compiles and works for device tree probe, we should
> have the following?
>
> depends on OF
>
Correct.
For currently it only supports dt.
> > + select REGMAP_MMIO
> > + help
> > + Select this option to enable accessing system control registers
> > + via regmap.
> > +
>
> <snip>
>
> > +struct regmap *syscon_node_to_regmap(struct device_node *np)
> > +{
> > + struct syscon *syscon;
> > + struct device *dev;
> > +
> > + dev = driver_find_device(&syscon_driver.driver, NULL, np,
> > + syscon_match);
> > + of_node_put(np);
>
> This looks a little unnatural to me. Function syscon_node_to_regmap
> becomes an API visible to clients, who might never know that np will
> be put inside the API. I'm saying the client may also call of_node_put
> to put the node they get.
We probably could add a comment here for the API to avoid this happen.
>
> I think of_node_put should be moved out from here and put into
> syscon_node_to_regmap and syscon_regmap_lookup_by_compatible.
>
I guess no, if you want to move of_node_put into syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle,
then syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle has the same issue.
Actually i had considered your concern when writing this API...
The original purpose of doing like that is saving some duplicated 'of_node_put'
and make the API easy to use.
I searched the kernel dt code and found it existed some similar cases.
e.g: of_irq_find_parent, of_get_next_parent
So it looks to me that it may be usually to do like that for the cases that
the conversion from a node to other thing since the client may only care
about the things converted. For our case, it's regmap.
So i can't think it make too much sense for all client driver have to write
duplicated and meaningless 'of_node_put' code.
Regards
Dong Aisheng
> > +
> > + if (!dev)
> > + return ERR_PTR(-EPROBE_DEFER);
> > +
> > + syscon = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> > +
> > + return syscon->regmap;
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(syscon_node_to_regmap);
> > +
> > +struct regmap *syscon_regmap_lookup_by_compatible(const char *s)
> > +{
> > + struct device_node *syscon_np;
> > +
> > + syscon_np = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, s);
> > + if (!syscon_np)
> > + return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
> > +
> > + return syscon_node_to_regmap(syscon_np);
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(syscon_regmap_lookup_by_compatible);
> > +
> > +struct regmap *syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle(struct device_node *np,
> > + const char *property)
> > +{
> > + struct device_node *syscon_np;
> > +
> > + syscon_np = of_parse_phandle(np, property, 0);
> > + if (!syscon_np)
> > + return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
> > +
> > + return syscon_node_to_regmap(syscon_np);
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-03 2:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-29 10:56 [PATCH v4 0/7] add syscon driver based on regmap for general registers access Dong Aisheng
2012-08-29 10:56 ` [PATCH v4 1/7] mfd: add syscon driver based on regmap Dong Aisheng
2012-08-31 1:26 ` Shawn Guo
2012-09-03 2:31 ` Dong Aisheng [this message]
2012-09-03 3:09 ` Shawn Guo
2012-09-03 8:02 ` Dong Aisheng
2012-08-29 10:56 ` [PATCH v4 2/7] ARM: imx6q: add iomuxc gpr support into syscon Dong Aisheng
2012-08-31 2:02 ` Shawn Guo
2012-09-03 2:46 ` Dong Aisheng
2012-08-29 10:56 ` [PATCH v4 3/7] ARM: imx6q: add anatop " Dong Aisheng
2012-08-29 10:56 ` [PATCH v4 4/7] regulator: anatop-regulator: convert to use syscon to access anatop register Dong Aisheng
2012-08-29 10:56 ` [PATCH v4 5/7] ARM: imx6q: convert to use syscon to access anatop registers Dong Aisheng
2012-08-29 10:56 ` [PATCH v4 6/7] ARM: dts: imx6q: add simple-bus compatible string for anatop Dong Aisheng
2012-08-29 10:56 ` [PATCH v4 7/7] mfd: anatop-mfd: remove anatop driver Dong Aisheng
2012-08-31 1:39 ` Shawn Guo
2012-09-03 2:34 ` Dong Aisheng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120903023102.GA11891@shlinux2.ap.freescale.net \
--to=b29396@freescale.com \
--cc=B20223@freescale.com \
--cc=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linus.walleij@stericsson.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lrg@ti.com \
--cc=rob.herring@calxeda.com \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=sameo@linux.intel.com \
--cc=shawn.guo@linaro.org \
--cc=swarren@wwwdotorg.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).